Documentation-first engineering proof of concept for a multifunctional crew-protection architecture focused on deep-space radiation risk reduction, geometry-aware mass placement, and concentrated storm-shelter logic.
IX-Shield is a concept-stage repository.
It is:
- a proof-of-concept architecture package;
- a reviewable repository for bounded screening logic;
- a documentation-first engineering build.
It is not:
- flight qualified;
- crew rated;
- transport validated;
- operationally approved;
- a complete solution to deep-space radiation.
IX-Shield exists to package a technically serious crew-protection concept in a form that can be reviewed without hype.
The repository is built around a simple idea:
crew protection is not just a wall-thickness problem.
It is a combined problem involving:
- shielding mass choice;
- crew location;
- surrounding mission mass;
- local refuge design;
- emergency shelter concentration;
- disciplined non-claims.
IX-Shield is organized around three linked concepts:
A low-Z / hydrogen-rich-biased conceptual shell intended for concept-stage passive-shielding screening.
A concentrated refuge enhancement intended to improve local protection during elevated event conditions through additional water-equivalent and hydrogen-rich mass near crew.
A zone-based view of the habitat that treats crew-core placement and surrounding mass distribution as part of the protection architecture.
The docs/ directory contains:
- project charter;
- architecture overview;
- threat model;
- requirements and acceptance criteria;
- science basis;
- geometry, contamination, risk, and operational boundary documents;
- test matrix and procedure documents;
- traceability and references.
The configs/ directory contains:
- baseline stack configuration;
- storm-shelter add-on configurations;
- reference vehicle zone configuration.
The src/analysis/ directory contains:
- baseline areal-density screening;
- storm-shelter screening;
- zone mass-budget screening.
The tests/ directory contains regression coverage for the analysis scripts.
The results/ directory stores processed outputs for manual review.
The BOM/ directory contains the concept-stage bill of materials.
The current stored proof-of-concept outputs include:
- Baseline stack total areal density: 20.7000 g/cm^2
- Practical shelter add-on screening depth: 10.1160 cm water-equivalent proxy
- Reference zone mass allocation total: 7450.00 kg across five zones
These are repository screening values only. They are not validated crew-protection performance values.
For a clean first review, read the repo in this order:
docs/00_Project_Charter.mddocs/01_Architecture_Overview.mddocs/02_Radiation_Threat_Model_and_Environments.mddocs/03_Requirements_and_Acceptance_Criteria.mddocs/16_Storm_Shelter_Concept.mddocs/17_Analysis_Pipeline_Walkthrough.mdresults/
IX-Shield/
├─ BOM/
├─ configs/
│ ├─ stacks/
│ └─ zones/
├─ docs/
├─ results/
├─ src/
│ └─ analysis/
├─ tests/
├─ LICENSE
├─ CITATION.cff
├─ CONTRIBUTING.md
├─ SECURITY.md
├─ DELTA_REPORT.md
└─ README.md
What This Repo Is Good For
IX-Shield is most useful for:
concept review;
architecture critique;
early trade-study framing;
proof-of-concept shielding logic discussion;
geometry-aware crew-protection discussion;
portfolio or research-positioning review.
What This Repo Is Not Good For
IX-Shield should not be used as:
a direct implementation package;
a flight design release;
a safety certification artifact;
a transport-validation substitute;
an operational decision package.
License
This repository is distributed under an evaluation-only license.
You may inspect, review, and perform bounded non-operational evaluation under the license terms.
You may not use the repository for unrestricted real-world implementation, deployment, commercialization, or operational integration without prior written permission from the repository owner.
See:
LICENSE
Citation
If you reference the repository in technical discussion or evaluation work, use:
CITATION.cff
Author
Bryce Lovell
Final Note
IX-Shield is meant to be taken seriously because it is bounded, reviewable, and honest about what it does not prove.
It is a disciplined architecture package, not a miracle-shield claim.