Skip to content

Update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v4.4.1#540

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/equals.verifier.version
Open

Update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v4.4.1#540
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/equals.verifier.version

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 15, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier (source) 4.2.54.4.1 age confidence

Release Notes

jqno/equalsverifier (nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier)

v4.4.1

Fixed
  • A regression where floats and doubles are checked (and throw an exception) that are static (Issue 1183), transient (Issue 1184) or ignored with #withIgnoredFields().

v4.4

Fixed
  • A regression where floats and doubles are checked (and throw an exception) that are static (Issue 1183), transient (Issue 1184) or ignored with #withIgnoredFields().

v4.3.1

Changed

v4.3

Changed

v4.2.6

Fixed
  • If first permitted and non-abstract subclass of a sealed type has a recursion, EqualsVerifier throws RecursionException instead of trying the second permitted non-abstract subclass. (Issue 1081)
Changed
  • Avoids potential parameter order bug when instantiating records. (Issue 1160; thanks lycoris106!)
  • More performance improvements.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the renovate label Mar 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants