Use mem::take instead of mem::replace when applicable#4881
Merged
bors merged 8 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Jan 4, 2020
Merged
Use mem::take instead of mem::replace when applicable#4881bors merged 8 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
mem::take instead of mem::replace when applicable#4881bors merged 8 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Loading
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
std::mem::takecan be used to replace a value of typeTwithT::default()instead ofstd::mem::replace.Fixes issue #4871
changelog: Added lint for [
mem_replace_with_default]