Skip to content

spec(MCP): Add specification for RedisVL MCP server (only for review; do not merge)#531

Open
vishal-bala wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
feat/RAAE-1395-redisvl-mcp
Open

spec(MCP): Add specification for RedisVL MCP server (only for review; do not merge)#531
vishal-bala wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
feat/RAAE-1395-redisvl-mcp

Conversation

@vishal-bala
Copy link
Collaborator

@vishal-bala vishal-bala commented Mar 12, 2026

Recreating this PR to separate the spec branch from the development branches. Development will be merged gradually into this epic branch, so that we can PR a functional MCP server into main when it's ready.

This PR (not to be merged) introduces a specification document for the RedisVL MCP framework. The goal is to have a clear design document to guide agentic development on this feature.


Note

Low Risk
Adds documentation only (no runtime/code changes), so the main risk is misleading future implementation if the spec is inaccurate or drifts from existing behavior.

Overview
Adds a new draft spec document spec/MCP.md that defines the intended MCP server contract for RedisVL, including configuration schema/env substitution rules, startup/shutdown and concurrency expectations, and the request/response/error semantics for redisvl-search and redisvl-upsert tools.

The spec also outlines planned module structure, optional dependency extras, CLI integration (rvl mcp), testing strategy, and known risks/mitigations for the upcoming implementation.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 1d1e5cc. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@jit-ci
Copy link

jit-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2026

🛡️ Jit Security Scan Results

CRITICAL HIGH MEDIUM

✅ No security findings were detected in this PR


Security scan by Jit

@vishal-bala vishal-bala force-pushed the feat/RAAE-1395-redisvl-mcp branch from 2f58b0f to 1d1e5cc Compare March 18, 2026 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant