Skip to content

docs: DR-7639 PostHog tracking strategy for Q1 2026 KRs#7665

Draft
ArthurGamby wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
dr-7639-posthog-tracking-strategy
Draft

docs: DR-7639 PostHog tracking strategy for Q1 2026 KRs#7665
ArthurGamby wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
dr-7639-posthog-tracking-strategy

Conversation

@ArthurGamby
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Comprehensive PostHog tracking strategy and implementation plan for Q1 2026 KRs. This is a research document for team review — no code changes yet.

  • Audits current analytics state (2 custom events, 94% of console links untagged)
  • Maps every KR to the tracking gaps blocking it
  • Proposes 9 new events + 1 super property across ~10 files (~200 lines)
  • Defines UTM standardization via a remark plugin (auto-injects UTMs at build time)
  • Specifies 4 PostHog dashboards to build once events are flowing

What to review

The full strategy is in posthog-tracking-strategy.md. Key sections to focus on:

  1. TL;DR — quick summary table
  2. Section 3: Event Catalog — are we tracking the right things?
  3. Section 5: UTM Standardization — does the taxonomy make sense?
  4. Section 6: High-Intent Definition — do we agree on what "high-intent" means for KR 1.2?
  5. Section 8: Open Questions — things we need answers on before implementing

Linear

Closes DR-7639

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Comprehensive audit and implementation plan for PostHog instrumentation
across docs and blog. Covers event catalog, UTM standardization,
getting-started funnels, and dashboard specs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 17, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a83a291b-d52b-4d90-bf9e-7db5611d386a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Tip

You can validate your CodeRabbit configuration file in your editor.

If your editor has YAML language server, you can enable auto-completion and validation by adding # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json at the top of your CodeRabbit configuration file.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 17, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
blog Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 17, 2026 3:49pm
docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 17, 2026 3:49pm
eclipse Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 17, 2026 3:49pm

Request Review

@argos-ci
Copy link

argos-ci bot commented Mar 17, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Argos notifications ↗︎

Build Status Details Updated (UTC)
default (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - Mar 17, 2026, 3:52 PM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant