Conversation
14dbb31 to
846c842
Compare
9d2ccb6 to
d7af1ff
Compare
1c8604d to
1845b19
Compare
239cf57 to
a648792
Compare
n-dusan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks awesome. Left some minor suggestions
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "feature/cool-feature": 20, | ||
| "bugfix/urgent-fix": 15 | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: A sentence or two explaining what the threshold number means would be useful
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I removed this file and merged everything with the testing docs that I asked Cal to write
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "renatav/performance-tests": 15 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question: can we bring this threshold to be lower? Is 15 times slower before it errors out too much?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's 15%. The default is 10%, this is just an example of how to overwrite the default value
.github/workflows/ci.yml
Outdated
|
|
||
| env: | ||
| ARTIFACT_NAME: benchmark-results${{ matrix.python-version }} | ||
| BRANCH_NAME: 'master' # needs to be changed to master before merging |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| BRANCH_NAME: 'master' # needs to be changed to master before merging | |
| BRANCH_NAME: 'master' |
| script: | | ||
| const artifacts = await github.rest.actions.listArtifactsForRepo({ | ||
| owner: context.repo.owner, | ||
| repo: context.repo.repo, | ||
| }); | ||
| const filteredArtifacts = artifacts.data.artifacts.filter(artifact => artifact.name === process.env.ARTIFACT_NAME); | ||
| let latestArtifact = null; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const artifact of filteredArtifacts) { | ||
| const run = await github.rest.actions.getWorkflowRun({ | ||
| owner: context.repo.owner, | ||
| repo: context.repo.repo, | ||
| run_id: artifact.workflow_run.id, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (run.data.head_branch === process.env.BRANCH_NAME) { | ||
| if (!latestArtifact || new Date(artifact.created_at) > new Date(latestArtifact.created_at)) { | ||
| latestArtifact = artifact; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (latestArtifact) { | ||
| console.log(`Found latest artifact: ${latestArtifact.id}`); | ||
| core.setOutput('artifact_id', latestArtifact.id.toString()); | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.log('No matching artifacts found.'); | ||
| core.setOutput('artifact_id', ''); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question: could we check in this javascript (and other) code somewhere in the .github (e.g. .github/scripts) directory and have GitHub actions require the file? The benefit is that we have syntax highlighting and would be easier to debug [1]?
…load code to a separate js file
a1fd500 to
a7f863f
Compare
19a4aca to
a7f863f
Compare
| - name: Run pre-commit and test with pytest | ||
| # - name: Run pre-commit and test with pytest | ||
| # run: | | ||
| # pre-commit run --all-files | ||
| # pytest taf/tests | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question: is running pytest taf/tests/ and pre-commit supposed to be commented out?
| # Use a step to extract the branch name from github.ref | ||
| - name: Extract Branch Name | ||
| id: extract_branch | ||
| run: echo "::set-output name=branch::$(echo ${GITHUB_REF#refs/heads/})" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: set-output is getting deprecated. Could we please use the new approach [1]? The deprecation notice is here.
|
|
||
| ## Artifact Handling | ||
|
|
||
| - **Uploading Artifacts**: After benchmarks are run, the resulting `0001_output.json` file is uploaded as an artifact to GitHub Actions, allowing it to be used in future benchmark comparisons. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: adding link to the already uploaded artifacts (from some older GitHub Actions build as an example) would be very useful here
Description (e.g. "Related to ...", etc.)
Integrate benchmark tests into CI:
There are probably many ways in which we can compare this whole logic, but I think this is a good starting point and we'll have some basic performance tests. I think that we can close the issue and open new ones if we think of any improvements
Closes #571