Skip to content

chore: add dd-oleksii to the organization members list#537

Merged
toddbaert merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/add-dd-oleksii
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

chore: add dd-oleksii to the organization members list#537
toddbaert merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/add-dd-oleksii

Conversation

@toddbaert
Copy link
Member

@toddbaert toddbaert commented Mar 11, 2026

@dd-oleksii has been helping substantial with various SDKs and spec work, and has attending meetings as well.

PRs: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aopen-feature+involves%3Add-oleksii&type=pullrequests

Issues: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aopen-feature+involves%3Add-oleksii&type=issues

@dd-oleksii Please 👍 or approve this PR to signal your interest in joining the org, and you will get an invite in your email.

@dd-oleksii has been helping substantial with various SDKs and spec work, and has attending meetings as well.

PRs: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aopen-feature+involves%3Add-oleksii&type=pullrequests

Issues: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aopen-feature+involves%3Add-oleksii&type=issues

Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
@toddbaert toddbaert requested review from a team as code owners March 11, 2026 14:15
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the OpenFeature organization's member list by including 'dd-oleksii'. This addition acknowledges their significant contributions to various SDKs and specification work, as well as their active participation in meetings, formalizing their role within the organization.

Highlights

  • Organization Membership: Added 'dd-oleksii' to the list of members in the OpenFeature organization configuration.
Changelog
  • config/open-feature/org.yaml
    • Added 'dd-oleksii' to the members list.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new member to the organization's configuration file. While the addition is correct, I noticed that the list of members is not alphabetically sorted, contrary to a comment in the file indicating that it should be. I've provided a specific suggestion to sort the relevant block of members to improve the file's maintainability and adhere to the established convention.

@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 546ef55 into main Mar 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@toddbaert toddbaert deleted the chore/add-dd-oleksii branch March 12, 2026 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants