Skip to content

feat(taco): Add nestedAbiDecode schema for selectorless ABI validation#766

Draft
theref wants to merge 1 commit intonucypher:signing-epicfrom
theref:feat/nested-abi-decode
Draft

feat(taco): Add nestedAbiDecode schema for selectorless ABI validation#766
theref wants to merge 1 commit intonucypher:signing-epicfrom
theref:feat/nested-abi-decode

Conversation

@theref
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@theref theref commented Mar 5, 2026

Add abiDecodeValidationSchema and update abiParameterValidationSchema to support a third option alongside returnValueTest and nestedAbiValidation. Used for batch execution payloads.

The real work is in nucypher/nucypher#3723

Add abiDecodeValidationSchema and update abiParameterValidationSchema
to support a third option alongside returnValueTest and
nestedAbiValidation. Used for ERC-7579 batch execution payloads.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (signing-epic@5e72a50). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
packages/taco/src/conditions/schemas/signing.ts 93.75% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             signing-epic     #766   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   90.82%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?       98           
  Lines                   ?     8673           
  Branches                ?      568           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     7877           
  Misses                  ?      752           
  Partials                ?       44           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@theref theref self-assigned this Mar 5, 2026
@derekpierre derekpierre marked this pull request as draft March 26, 2026 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants