Skip to content

Release/4.0.0#748

Draft
stevenbal wants to merge 8 commits intomasterfrom
release/4.0.0
Draft

Release/4.0.0#748
stevenbal wants to merge 8 commits intomasterfrom
release/4.0.0

Conversation

@stevenbal
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevenbal stevenbal commented Mar 23, 2026

Fixes #730

TODO:

  • check breaking change commits and see if any other references need to be removed
  • test squashed migrations
    • compare db schema before and after squash
    • new install
    • existing install from 3.6.0

Changes

[Describe the changes here]

@stevenbal stevenbal marked this pull request as draft March 23, 2026 09:48
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 23, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.15%. Comparing base (8437d0a) to head (ea4c9de).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/objects/conf/base.py 84.61% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #748      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.37%   86.15%   -0.23%     
==========================================
  Files         145      147       +2     
  Lines        3142     3170      +28     
  Branches      253      256       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2714     2731      +17     
- Misses        376      392      +16     
+ Partials       52       47       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 23, 2026

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchrelease/4.0.0
Testbedubuntu-24.04
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_filter_by_object_type📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
127.55 ms
(+2.68%)Baseline: 124.22 ms
130.43 ms
(97.79%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_filter_one_result📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
19.30 ms
(-0.24%)Baseline: 19.35 ms
20.31 ms
(95.01%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_large_page_size_page_1📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
328.37 ms
(+4.75%)Baseline: 313.49 ms
329.17 ms
(99.76%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_large_page_size_page_5📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
332.75 ms
(+3.17%)Baseline: 322.53 ms
338.66 ms
(98.25%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_small_page_size_page_20📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
125.99 ms
(-2.59%)Baseline: 129.35 ms
135.82 ms
(92.77%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Prepare release 4.0.0

2 participants