Bringing in examples and tests based on new interface.#11
Merged
marcinmiklitz merged 6 commits intomarcinmiklitz:developmentfrom Jun 8, 2025
Merged
Bringing in examples and tests based on new interface.#11marcinmiklitz merged 6 commits intomarcinmiklitz:developmentfrom
marcinmiklitz merged 6 commits intomarcinmiklitz:developmentfrom
Conversation
marcinmiklitz
approved these changes
Jun 8, 2025
Owner
marcinmiklitz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm, thanks @andrewtarzia
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As with previous PRs, this is still unlikely to pass all the tests or GH actions because the code base has not been updated. But the tests and examples are equivalent (within numerical error) to before and adhering to them should minimise breaking changes.
Note that the tests that fail in test_molecular seem like genuine changes in the numerical rebuild process. I wonder if changing versions actually has altered some of the math slightly?
This will have to be explored upon code work - note the errors in other tests associated with
ValueError: setting an array element...are the whole reason why pywindow did not work in Python >= 3.9 (a long detour to get here, but I am happy with easier maintenance in the future!)Examples are now in jupyter notebook form and python script form. They do not currently run, but will act as a good test to ensure all outputs are maintained.