Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2025. It is now read-only.

[EISW-141730] 19.x Merge dialect changes#119

Closed
sramasit wants to merge 2 commits intointel:npu/release/19.xfrom
sramasit:sramasit/19.x
Closed

[EISW-141730] 19.x Merge dialect changes#119
sramasit wants to merge 2 commits intointel:npu/release/19.xfrom
sramasit:sramasit/19.x

Conversation

@sramasit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sramasit sramasit commented Apr 22, 2025

No description provided.

@sramasit sramasit requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2025 05:30
@@ -44,4 +44,3 @@ add_subdirectory(UB)
add_subdirectory(Utils)
add_subdirectory(Vector)
add_subdirectory(X86Vector)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks a bit radical. Is it possible to introduce a cmake option for disabling the dialect?

Something like we have for spirv:

if(MLIR_DIALECT_SPIRV_ENABLE)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. Based on the comment in the JIRA I thought we are doing a permanent cleanup. My initial solution was to disable using CMake options like you pointed above. I will proceed with CMake option then.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@sramasit sramasit force-pushed the sramasit/19.x branch 2 times, most recently from 9e422f7 to 98b43c9 Compare April 24, 2025 01:51
@sramasit sramasit changed the title EISW-163563 Permanently disable XeGPU dialect support [EISW-141730] 19.x Merge dialect changes Apr 24, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@andrey-golubev andrey-golubev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we bring this into the upstream first? And start a general discussion on the granularity of the MLIR? Otherwise, this is going to live forever in our repo which has a maintenance cost.

@sramasit sramasit force-pushed the sramasit/19.x branch 6 times, most recently from e0c9905 to 9668fe3 Compare April 29, 2025 05:08
sramasit added 2 commits May 28, 2025 17:21
Introduced a CMake option MLIR_DIALECT_XEGPU_ENABLE (default OFF) to optionally include the XeGPU dialect in the build.

Signed-off-by: Surendar Rama Sitaraman <surendar.rama.sitaraman@intel.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants