SRE-588: own stale approval logic and detect manual conflict resolutions#8577
Merged
SRE-588: own stale approval logic and detect manual conflict resolutions#8577
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
area/infra
Contributor
Author
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
lunelson
changed the title
PR SummaryMedium Risk Overview Extends stale-detection by fetching the latest approval commit from PR reviews and scanning merge commits after that point using Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 22f2cb6. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here. |
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Moves stale-approval dismissal logic in-repo and expands it to detect manual merge-conflict resolutions that can change code after an approval. Changes:
Technical Notes: Includes a bash self-test harness and a new 🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
.github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/check-manual-merge-resolutions.sh
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![semgrep-code-hashintel[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/22116112?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8577 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 62.49% 62.49%
=======================================
Files 1318 1318
Lines 134209 134209
Branches 5517 5517
=======================================
+ Hits 83876 83877 +1
+ Misses 49418 49417 -1
Partials 915 915 Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
TimDiekmann
reviewed
Mar 26, 2026
TimDiekmann
reviewed
Mar 26, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.
There are 3 total unresolved issues (including 2 from previous reviews).
Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.
TimDiekmann
reviewed
Mar 30, 2026
Member
TimDiekmann
left a comment
TimDiekmann
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me! I'd just wouldn't run the workflow for pull_request triggers if this action is not modified, but that's a minor thing.
Contributor
Benchmark results
|
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 | Flame Graph |
policy_resolution_medium
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 | Flame Graph |
policy_resolution_none
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 | Flame Graph |
policy_resolution_small
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 | Flame Graph | |
| resolve_policies_for_actor | user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 | Flame Graph |
read_scaling_complete
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_by_id;one_depth | 1 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;one_depth | 10 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;one_depth | 25 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;one_depth | 5 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;one_depth | 50 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;two_depth | 1 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;two_depth | 10 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;two_depth | 25 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;two_depth | 5 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;two_depth | 50 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;zero_depth | 1 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;zero_depth | 10 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;zero_depth | 25 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;zero_depth | 5 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id;zero_depth | 50 entities | Flame Graph |
read_scaling_linkless
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_by_id | 1 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | 10 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | 100 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | 1000 entities | Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | 10000 entities | Flame Graph |
representative_read_entity
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1
|
Flame Graph | |
| entity_by_id | entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1
|
Flame Graph |
representative_read_entity_type
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| get_entity_type_by_id | Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba
|
Flame Graph |
representative_read_multiple_entities
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_by_property | traversal_paths=0 | 0 | |
| entity_by_property | traversal_paths=255 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true | |
| entity_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false | |
| entity_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true | |
| entity_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true | |
| entity_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true | |
| link_by_source_by_property | traversal_paths=0 | 0 | |
| link_by_source_by_property | traversal_paths=255 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true | |
| link_by_source_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false | |
| link_by_source_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true | |
| link_by_source_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true | |
| link_by_source_by_property | traversal_paths=2 | 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true |
scenarios
| Function | Value | Mean | Flame graphs |
|---|---|---|---|
| full_test | query-limited | Flame Graph | |
| full_test | query-unlimited | Flame Graph | |
| linked_queries | query-limited | Flame Graph | |
| linked_queries | query-unlimited | Flame Graph |
TimDiekmann
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?
This PR closes the stale-approval gap described in SRE-588 by moving the workflow logic into this repo and teaching it to treat manual merge-conflict resolutions as approval-invalidating changes.
The original workflow depended on a forked action that only compared feature-commit ranges with
git range-diff, so merge commits with hand-resolved conflicts could change code after approval without dismissing reviews. This version keeps the existingrange-diffbehavior for stacked-PR safety, adds agit merge-treecheck for merge commits after the latest approval, and now fails safe if artifact lookup, approval lookup, or merge-resolution checking itself errors.🔗 Related links
🚫 Blocked by
🔍 What does this change?
turnage/dismiss-stale-approvalsdependency with a repo-owned composite action under.github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvalsgit range-diffdismissal behavior is preserved, while selecting the newest matching artifact deterministicallygit merge-treeto detect manual conflict resolutiondry-runbehavior by commenting on the PR instead of only logging locallyrange-diffstale parser between the action and self-test so the harness no longer reimplements that rule separatelygit range-diff-only check and does not address post-approval merge-commit conflict-resolution changesPre-Merge Checklist 🚀
🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?
This PR:
📜 Does this require a change to the docs?
The changes in this PR:
🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?
The changes in this PR:
action.ymltext directly rather than executing those paths through a runtime harness. That is a test-maintainability risk more than a stale-approval logic risk, and I wanted to leave it visible for reviewer judgment instead of widening this PR further without feedback.🐾 Next steps
self-test.shwith a more executable harness for action wiring🛡 What tests cover this?
npm run test:stale-approvalsbash .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/self-test.shbash -n .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/self-test.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/decide_stale_approvals.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/latest_approval_sha.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/check-manual-merge-resolutions.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/latest_artifact.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/dismiss-reviews.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/range_diff_stale.shshellcheck .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/self-test.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/decide_stale_approvals.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/latest_approval_sha.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/check-manual-merge-resolutions.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/latest_artifact.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/dismiss-reviews.sh .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/range_diff_stale.shyq '.' .github/workflows/dismiss-stale-approvals.yml >/dev/null && yq '.' .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/action.yml >/dev/nullgit diff --check❓ How to test this?
.github/workflows/dismiss-stale-approvals.ymland confirm it uses./.github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvalsnpm run test:stale-approvalsrange-diffparsingbash .github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/self-test.shdirectly to confirm the package script is only a repo-visible entrypoint for the same harness.github/actions/dismiss-stale-approvals/to confirm the policy is repo-owned and split into focused helpers rather than an external forked action📹 Demo