Update vitest npm packages

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
@effect/vitest (source)	0.27.0 -> 0.29.0
vitest-browser-react	2.0.5 -> 2.1.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

Effect-TS/effect (@​effect/vitest)

v0.29.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [f7bb09b, bd7552a, ad1a7eb, 0d32048, 0d32048]:
  • effect@​3.21.0

v0.28.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [fc82e81, 82996bc, 4d97a61, f6b0960, 8798a84]:
  • effect@​3.20.0

vitest-community/vitest-browser-react (vitest-browser-react)

v2.1.0

Compare Source

   🚀 Features

• Integrate trace mark with render  -  by @​hi-ogawa and Claude Opus 4.6 in #​47 (2b983)

   🐞 Bug Fixes

• Update links to api documentation  -  by @​nilshartmann in #​48 (91885)

    View changes on GitHub

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 3, 2026 1:00am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 3, 2026 1:00am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 3, 2026 1:00am

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Apr 3, 2026 1:00am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk dependency bumps limited to test tooling, though they may cause minor CI/test behavior changes due to updated peer dependency expectations.

Overview
Updates test-related dependencies: bumps @effect/vitest from 0.27.0 to 0.29.0 for @local/harpc-client and refreshes yarn.lock accordingly (including new effect peer requirement).

Also updates vitest-browser-react in yarn.lock from 2.0.5 to 2.1.0.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 94c58b4. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Harpc TypeScript client’s dev dependency on @effect/vitest from 0.27.0 to 0.29.0.
Why: Keeps the Effect/Vitest integration current with upstream patch releases (lockfile updated accordingly).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[augmentcode]

@effect/vitest@0.29.0 appears to pull in effect@3.21.x; since this package pins effect to 3.20.0, please double-check the install doesn’t end up with two effect versions (which can cause subtle test/runtime/type mismatches).

Severity: medium

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/js/vitest-npm-packages (ed29fbd) with main (82b4650)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (52299fd) during the generation of this report, so 82b4650 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.480 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$40.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.207 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.36 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.945 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.628 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$78.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.254 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$421 \mathrm{ms} \pm 820 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.374 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$92.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$262 \mathrm{ms} \pm 912 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$18.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$18.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.090 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.551 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.680 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$33.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$32.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.699 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$98.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 453 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 415 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 523 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.307 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 503 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 449 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.636 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 565 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$90.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$506 \mathrm{ms} \pm 967 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.427 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[lunelson]

seems low risk

Latest approval commit 12583c0 is not an ancestor of 94c58b4, indicating rewritten history after approval