H-4830: Set up autofix.yml in CI

[vilkinsons]

See the docs; step 1 (installing the GitHub App) has already been completed.

🚫 Blocked by

• Add TypeScript/JS formatting
• Add Rust formatting
• Add Python formatting
• Optional: Add webp autoconverter (similar to PNG compression example given in the docs)
• Optional: Make formatting execution intelligent based on changed files in a PR?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.26%. Comparing base (a76ee6a) to head (614e830).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7459      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.11%   52.26%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files        1084     1085       +1     
  Lines       96024    96408     +384     
  Branches     4434     4448      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits        50043    50383     +340     
- Misses      45034    45075      +41     
- Partials      947      950       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	35.85% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.68% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	74.75% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	89.07% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.97% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	95.84% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	91.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	75.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	3.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	27.57% <ø> (+0.30%)	⬆️
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	19.45% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	27.52% <ø> (-0.40%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.30% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	86.12% <ø> (+0.36%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-compiletest	51.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.21% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	50.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	84.31% <ø> (+4.35%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	97.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$8.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.848 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$8.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$8.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$9.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$60.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 442 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.459 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$49.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$73.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 475 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$63.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$92.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 511 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$88.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$81.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.831 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$96.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 742 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.43 \mathrm{s} \pm 542 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$63.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$187 \mathrm{ms} \pm 537 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.483 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$10.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.508 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$8.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$8.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$8.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$9.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.705 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$22.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[vilkinsons]

Won't merge this in current form (even with the "blocked by" tasks from the PR description addressed, which is now outdated).

If anything we will instead look at using pre-commit.ci to execute pre-commit hooks, instead (if for some reason they have been missed) per the docs.

See https://pre-commit.ci/lite.html