Skip to content

Add issue for automated changelogs#21912

Merged
mattKorwel merged 1 commit intomainfrom
changelog-issue
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

Add issue for automated changelogs#21912
mattKorwel merged 1 commit intomainfrom
changelog-issue

Conversation

@g-samroberts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@g-samroberts g-samroberts commented Mar 10, 2026

Summary

Add issue for automated changelogs, so they show up on our project board. Currently automatically generated changelog PRs don't have an issue tied to them, and can get lost in the PR mix.

With this change, changelogs will link to #18505. This way the auto triage both will transitively apply the area/documentation label and put the PR in Technical Writer project, so it appears on our PR review list. This is the main changelog issue, this also serves to put all changelog PRs under one issue for easier search/development.

Note that this is different from the issue that engineering might use to track the release that results in the changelog.

Related to #18505

@g-samroberts g-samroberts requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2026 18:42
@gemini-cli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

gemini-cli bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Hi @g-samroberts, thank you so much for your contribution to Gemini CLI! We really appreciate the time and effort you've put into this.

We're making some updates to our contribution process to improve how we track and review changes. Please take a moment to review our recent discussion post: Improving Our Contribution Process & Introducing New Guidelines.

Key Update: Starting January 26, 2026, the Gemini CLI project will require all pull requests to be associated with an existing issue. Any pull requests not linked to an issue by that date will be automatically closed.

Thank you for your understanding and for being a part of our community!

@gemini-cli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

gemini-cli bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Hi there! Thank you for your contribution to Gemini CLI.

To improve our contribution process and better track changes, we now require all pull requests to be associated with an existing issue, as announced in our recent discussion and as detailed in our CONTRIBUTING.md.

This pull request is being closed because it is not currently linked to an issue. Once you have updated the description of this PR to link an issue (e.g., by adding Fixes #123 or Related to #123), it will be automatically reopened.

How to link an issue:
Add a keyword followed by the issue number (e.g., Fixes #123) in the description of your pull request. For more details on supported keywords and how linking works, please refer to the GitHub Documentation on linking pull requests to issues.

Thank you for your understanding and for being a part of our community!

@gemini-cli gemini-cli bot closed this Mar 10, 2026
@g-samroberts g-samroberts reopened this Mar 10, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Size Change: -4 B (0%)

Total Size: 26.2 MB

ℹ️ View Unchanged
Filename Size Change
./bundle/gemini.js 25.7 MB -4 B (0%)
./bundle/node_modules/@google/gemini-cli-devtools/dist/client/main.js 221 kB 0 B
./bundle/node_modules/@google/gemini-cli-devtools/dist/src/_client-assets.js 227 kB 0 B
./bundle/node_modules/@google/gemini-cli-devtools/dist/src/index.js 11.5 kB 0 B
./bundle/node_modules/@google/gemini-cli-devtools/dist/src/types.js 132 B 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-permissive-open.sb 890 B 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-permissive-proxied.sb 1.31 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-restrictive-open.sb 3.36 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-restrictive-proxied.sb 3.56 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-strict-open.sb 4.82 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-strict-proxied.sb 5.02 kB 0 B

compressed-size-action

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also if a changelog PR is opened after a patch, it'll be useful to link the PR to the patched PR so that maintainers remember to review and merge it - something like this: #21713 (comment)

@gemini-cli gemini-cli bot added area/platform Issues related to Build infra, Release mgmt, Testing, Eval infra, Capacity, Quota mgmt area/documentation Gemini CLI documentation tasks and issues 🔒 maintainer only ⛔ Do not contribute. Internal roadmap item. labels Mar 10, 2026
@g-samroberts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

g-samroberts commented Mar 11, 2026

@jerop That would be helpful in tracking + merging the changelog update, but this workflow is triggered by the release event as opposed to a dispatch like the workflow that creates the patch comments. I'm not sure the patch PR would be available to this workflow... any ideas? This could be a good area for future improvement.

For now my aim was to tie it to the Docs tracking issue so it transitively gets the TW project applied, which means it shows up on our PR tracking list.

Let me know your thoughts!

@g-samroberts g-samroberts self-assigned this Mar 11, 2026
@mattKorwel mattKorwel added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 12, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 35bf746 Mar 12, 2026
40 of 48 checks passed
@mattKorwel mattKorwel deleted the changelog-issue branch March 12, 2026 01:55
liamhelmer pushed a commit to badal-io/gemini-cli that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2026
ruomengz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2026
SUNDRAM07 pushed a commit to SUNDRAM07/gemini-cli that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/documentation Gemini CLI documentation tasks and issues area/platform Issues related to Build infra, Release mgmt, Testing, Eval infra, Capacity, Quota mgmt 🔒 maintainer only ⛔ Do not contribute. Internal roadmap item.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants