Support async logical combinations for permissions#85
Open
CristopherH95 wants to merge 4 commits intoem1208:mainfrom
Open
Support async logical combinations for permissions#85CristopherH95 wants to merge 4 commits intoem1208:mainfrom
CristopherH95 wants to merge 4 commits intoem1208:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is my proposed solution to #82. The following changes are introduced:
permissions.pymodule that provides anAsyncBasePermission, for simplifying logical combinations of async permissions.AND,OR, andNOTlogic operators from Django Rest Framework.try_convert_operatorfunction, which is hooked into theget_permissionsview method, for the purpose of normalizing combinations of sync and async logic operators.I tried to come up with an approach that is more or less a "drop in solution", to avoid breaking things. My intention was for this to work with existing permissions classes, as well as custom ones.
Resolves #82.