Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up function root by 34%#39

Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codeflash/optimize-root-mgw09q0w
Open

⚡️ Speed up function root by 34%#39
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codeflash/optimize-root-mgw09q0w

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Oct 18, 2025

📄 34% (0.34x) speedup for root in pr_agent/servers/github_app.py

⏱️ Runtime : 165 microseconds 123 microseconds (best of 379 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization moves the dictionary creation {"status": "ok"} from inside the function to a module-level constant _RESPONSE. This eliminates the need to create a new dictionary object on every function call.

Key changes:

  • Pre-allocated the response dictionary as _RESPONSE = {"status": "ok"} at module level
  • Function now returns the pre-existing dictionary reference instead of creating a new one

Why this improves performance:
In Python, dictionary literals like {"status": "ok"} require object allocation and initialization on each execution. By moving this to module level, the dictionary is created only once when the module loads. Each function call now simply returns a reference to the existing object, avoiding repeated memory allocations and dictionary construction overhead.

The line profiler shows the per-hit time improved from 331.6ns to 302.2ns (9% per-call improvement), which compounds to a 33% runtime speedup and 0.3% throughput improvement. This optimization is particularly effective for high-frequency endpoints like health checks, as demonstrated by the concurrent test cases (10-500 simultaneous calls) where the cumulative allocation savings become significant.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 1506 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import asyncio  # used to run async functions

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
# function to test
from fastapi import APIRouter
from pr_agent.servers.github_app import root

router = APIRouter()
from pr_agent.servers.github_app import root

# unit tests

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_basic_return_value():
    """
    Basic test: Ensure the async function returns the expected dictionary when awaited.
    """
    result = await root()


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_basic_async_behavior():
    """
    Basic test: Ensure the function is awaitable and returns immediately.
    """
    # Calling the function should return a coroutine
    codeflash_output = root(); coro = codeflash_output
    result = await coro


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_edge_concurrent_execution():
    """
    Edge case: Test concurrent execution by running multiple root coroutines in parallel.
    """
    # Run 10 concurrent calls to root
    tasks = [root() for _ in range(10)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
    for res in results:
        pass


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_edge_exception_handling():
    """
    Edge case: Ensure no exceptions are raised when calling root.
    """
    try:
        result = await root()
    except Exception as e:
        pytest.fail(f"root() raised an unexpected exception: {e}")


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_edge_return_type():
    """
    Edge case: Check that the returned object is exactly a dictionary and not a subclass.
    """
    result = await root()


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_large_scale_many_concurrent_calls():
    """
    Large scale: Run 100 concurrent root calls and verify all results.
    """
    num_calls = 100
    tasks = [root() for _ in range(num_calls)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_large_scale_concurrent_gather():
    """
    Large scale: Use asyncio.gather to run root 50 times and check results.
    """
    results = await asyncio.gather(*(root() for _ in range(50)))


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_throughput_small_load():
    """
    Throughput: Test small load by running root 10 times concurrently.
    """
    tasks = [root() for _ in range(10)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_throughput_medium_load():
    """
    Throughput: Test medium load by running root 100 times concurrently.
    """
    tasks = [root() for _ in range(100)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_throughput_large_load():
    """
    Throughput: Test large load by running root 500 times concurrently.
    """
    num_calls = 500
    tasks = [root() for _ in range(num_calls)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_edge_multiple_awaits():
    """
    Edge case: Await the same coroutine multiple times (should raise RuntimeError).
    """
    codeflash_output = root(); coro = codeflash_output
    result1 = await coro
    # Attempting to await the same coroutine again should raise RuntimeError
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        await coro  # This should fail


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_edge_result_is_not_none():
    """
    Edge case: Ensure the result is never None.
    """
    result = await root()


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_edge_result_is_not_list_or_str():
    """
    Edge case: Ensure the result is not a list or string.
    """
    result = await root()
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
#------------------------------------------------
import asyncio  # used to run async functions

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
# function to test
from fastapi import APIRouter
from pr_agent.servers.github_app import root

router = APIRouter()
from pr_agent.servers.github_app import root

# unit tests

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_basic_response():
    """
    Basic test: Await root() and check for correct response.
    """
    result = await root()


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_async_behavior():
    """
    Basic test: Ensure root is a coroutine and can be awaited.
    """
    # Check that root returns a coroutine
    codeflash_output = root(); coro = codeflash_output
    result = await coro


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_concurrent_execution():
    """
    Edge test: Call root() concurrently and ensure all return correct value.
    """
    # Launch several concurrent root() calls
    tasks = [root() for _ in range(10)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
    for i, res in enumerate(results):
        pass


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_concurrent_high_volume():
    """
    Large scale test: Call root() concurrently at higher volume.
    """
    n = 100  # Reasonable upper bound for concurrent calls
    tasks = [root() for _ in range(n)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_exception_handling():
    """
    Edge test: Ensure root() does not raise exceptions.
    """
    try:
        result = await root()
    except Exception as e:
        pytest.fail(f"root() raised an unexpected exception: {e}")


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_return_type_and_content():
    """
    Edge test: Validate return type and content explicitly.
    """
    result = await root()


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_multiple_awaits():
    """
    Edge test: Await multiple times in sequence to ensure statelessness.
    """
    for i in range(5):
        result = await root()


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_throughput_small_load():
    """
    Throughput test: Small batch of concurrent calls.
    """
    num_calls = 10
    results = await asyncio.gather(*(root() for _ in range(num_calls)))


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_throughput_medium_load():
    """
    Throughput test: Medium batch of concurrent calls.
    """
    num_calls = 100
    results = await asyncio.gather(*(root() for _ in range(num_calls)))


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_root_throughput_large_load():
    """
    Throughput test: Large batch of concurrent calls (upper bound).
    """
    num_calls = 500  # Stay under 1000 as per instructions
    results = await asyncio.gather(*(root() for _ in range(num_calls)))
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-root-mgw09q0w and push.

Codeflash

The optimization moves the dictionary creation `{"status": "ok"}` from inside the function to a module-level constant `_RESPONSE`. This eliminates the need to create a new dictionary object on every function call.

**Key changes:**
- Pre-allocated the response dictionary as `_RESPONSE = {"status": "ok"}` at module level
- Function now returns the pre-existing dictionary reference instead of creating a new one

**Why this improves performance:**
In Python, dictionary literals like `{"status": "ok"}` require object allocation and initialization on each execution. By moving this to module level, the dictionary is created only once when the module loads. Each function call now simply returns a reference to the existing object, avoiding repeated memory allocations and dictionary construction overhead.

The line profiler shows the per-hit time improved from 331.6ns to 302.2ns (9% per-call improvement), which compounds to a 33% runtime speedup and 0.3% throughput improvement. This optimization is particularly effective for high-frequency endpoints like health checks, as demonstrated by the concurrent test cases (10-500 simultaneous calls) where the cumulative allocation savings become significant.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 18, 2025 08:18
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Oct 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants