Refactoring: move docker driver Simulate field as a config parameter.

[silvin-lubecki]

Small refactoring, as I think this Simulate field has nothing to do here, since there's a config map for this kind of parameters.

Signed-off-by: Silvin Lubecki silvin.lubecki@docker.com

[michelleN]

I believe you'll also want to add SIMULATE to this list of config options on the docker_driver here.

[silvin-lubecki]

@michelleN I don't understand your comment, I already made this change, is it right?

[silvin-lubecki]

PTAL @michelleN @radu-matei

[radu-matei]

As the Simulate field is only present in the Docker driver, and there is already another way of passing config, I think we should be consistent -- and this approach is the most straightforward.

That being said, also have a look at the Docker driver test below:

$ make test
go test  ./...
# github.com/deislabs/duffle/pkg/driver [github.com/deislabs/duffle/pkg/driver.test]
pkg/driver/driver_test.go:58:19: d.(*DockerDriver).Simulate undefined (type *DockerDriver has no field or method Simulate)

Thanks!

[silvin-lubecki]

Woops, thank you for spotting that @radu-matei ! But that's weird the CI didn't catch it 🤔
I'll fix that right away 👍

[radu-matei]

Curious how none of the two CIs kicked in at all. Investigating..

[silvin-lubecki]

Should be fixed + rebased 👍

[silvin-lubecki]

PTAL @radu-matei @michelleN

[silvin-lubecki]

PTAL @radu-matei @michelleN