chore(deps): update dependency cryptography to v46.0.6 [security]

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
cryptography (changelog)	==46.0.5 → ==46.0.6

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2026-34073

Summary

In versions of cryptography prior to 46.0.5, DNS name constraints were only validated against SANs within child certificates, and not the "peer name" presented during each validation. Consequently, cryptography would allow a peer named bar.example.com to validate against a wildcard leaf certificate for *.example.com, even if the leaf's parent certificate (or upwards) contained an excluded subtree constraint for bar.example.com.

This behavior resulted from a gap between RFC 5280 (which defines Name Constraint semantics) and RFC 9525 (which defines service identity semantics): put together, neither states definitively whether Name Constraints should be applied to peer names. To close this gap, cryptography now conservatively rejects any validation where the peer name would be rejected by a name constraint if it were a SAN instead.

In practice, exploitation of this bypass requires an uncommon X.509 topology, one that the Web PKI avoids because it exhibits these kinds of problems. Consequently, we consider this a medium-to-low impact severity.

See CVE-2025-61727 for a similar bypass in Go's crypto/x509.

Remediation

Users should upgrade to 46.0.6 or newer.

Attribution

Reporter: @​1seal

---

Release Notes

pyca/cryptography (cryptography)

v46.0.6

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[github-actions]

Test results for commit c0999a0

Test coverage for c0999a0

Name            Stmts   Miss Branch BrPart  Cover   Missing
-----------------------------------------------------------
src/charm.py       47      0      6      0   100%
src/errors.py       1      0      0      0   100%
src/state.py      139      0     32      0   100%
-----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL             187      0     38      0   100%

Static code analysis report

Run started:2026-03-29 04:23:40.384383+00:00

Test results:
  No issues identified.

Code scanned:
  Total lines of code: 986
  Total lines skipped (#nosec): 0
  Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 0

Run metrics:
  Total issues (by severity):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
  Total issues (by confidence):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
Files skipped (0):

[github-actions]

Test results for commit c0999a0

Test coverage for c0999a0

Name                   Stmts   Miss Branch BrPart  Cover   Missing
------------------------------------------------------------------
src/certificates.py       21      2      6      2    85%   65-68
src/charm.py             106     12      8      0    89%   64-65, 120, 149, 153-156, 211-213, 223-225
src/errors.py             16      0      0      0   100%
src/nginx_manager.py     199     36     16      4    81%   207, 213-219, 224-226, 229, 277-279, 295-297, 337-342, 417-419, 438-442, 461->463, 543-548
src/state.py             163     13     34      1    92%   154-159, 429-439
src/utilities.py          13      0      0      0   100%
------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                    518     63     64      7    88%

Static code analysis report

Run started:2026-03-29 04:27:12.600389+00:00

Test results:
  No issues identified.

Code scanned:
  Total lines of code: 1208
  Total lines skipped (#nosec): 0
  Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 2

Run metrics:
  Total issues (by severity):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
  Total issues (by confidence):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
Files skipped (0):