Skip to content

cm: communication: suppress template recursion error in tests#199

Open
mlohvynenko wants to merge 1 commit intoaosedge:feature_release_9.1from
mlohvynenko:fix_lint
Open

cm: communication: suppress template recursion error in tests#199
mlohvynenko wants to merge 1 commit intoaosedge:feature_release_9.1from
mlohvynenko:fix_lint

Conversation

@mlohvynenko
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 6, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (feature_release_9.1@79b59a6). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##             feature_release_9.1     #199   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                       ?   82.42%           
======================================================
  Files                          ?      325           
  Lines                          ?    31154           
  Branches                       ?     3218           
======================================================
  Hits                           ?    25680           
  Misses                         ?     5474           
  Partials                       ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

StaticArray<StaticString<oci::cDigestLen>, 1> digests;
digests.EmplaceBack(cDigest);
// cppcheck-suppress templateRecursion
auto digests = std::make_unique<StaticArray<StaticString<oci::cDigestLen>, 1>>();
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Digest is small, do you really need to make it unique?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree
kept only cpp check suppression

Signed-off-by: Mykhailo Lohvynenko <mykhailo_lohvynenko@epam.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 6, 2026

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
E Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mykola-kobets-epam mykola-kobets-epam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed-by: Mykola Kobets <mykola_kobets@epam.com>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@al1img al1img left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Grytsov <oleksandr_grytsov@epam.com>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants