Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Server-Side Request Forgery for Reserved IPs#23

Open
ManupaKDU wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel-fix-ssrf-broadcast-address-2619160518815945850
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Server-Side Request Forgery for Reserved IPs#23
ManupaKDU wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel-fix-ssrf-broadcast-address-2619160518815945850

Conversation

@ManupaKDU
Copy link
Contributor

🚨 Severity: HIGH
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: The is_reachable function validated if an IP was correctly formatted, but did not restrict the semantic destination for broadcast addresses and other reserved subnets. This allowed Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where the scanner could be manipulated into pinging 255.255.255.255. Pinging broadcast addresses can lead to amplification attacks or unintended network noise.
🎯 Impact: An attacker could trigger unintended network noise, or potentially use the tool in an amplification/reflection attack.
πŸ”§ Fix: Added ip_obj.is_reserved to the block list in testping1.py to prevent pinging reserved IPs (such as the broadcast IP). Also appended an entry in .jules/sentinel.md documenting this learning.
βœ… Verification: Ensure the test cases pass and the logic handles 255.255.255.255 appropriately. Tests have been modified and confirm this check is evaluated correctly.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2619160518815945850 started by @ManupaKDU

The previous logic in `is_reachable` blocked loopback, link-local, multicast, and unspecified addresses but missed explicitly reserved subnets and the broadcast IP (`255.255.255.255`). This PR extends the SSRF protection to block IPs that resolve to `is_reserved`.

Also includes tests in `test_testping1.py` and a journal entry in `.jules/sentinel.md`.

Co-authored-by: ManupaKDU <95234271+ManupaKDU@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant