Skip to content

chore: list device display incorrect jump around#99

Merged
ngovinh2k2 merged 2 commits intodevfrom
chore/list-device-display-incorrect-jump-around
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

chore: list device display incorrect jump around#99
ngovinh2k2 merged 2 commits intodevfrom
chore/list-device-display-incorrect-jump-around

Conversation

@ngovinh2k2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What?

List device display incorrect jump around

Why?

From the request

How?

Testing?

  • Functional Testing
  • Security
  • Performance
  • Error Handling
  • Code Quality
  • Documentation
  • Database
  • Deployment
  • Final Review

Anything Else?

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an issue where device lists exhibited inconsistent ordering, leading to a 'jump around' effect in the display. The changes ensure a stable and predictable presentation of device data by explicitly setting a default descending order based on the creation timestamp for all relevant device listings.

Highlights

  • Device List Ordering: Implemented consistent descending order by creation timestamp for device lists in both the general DeviceViewSet and the space-specific ListCreateSpaceDeviceViewSet to prevent display inconsistencies and 'jump around' behavior.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request modifies apps/device/views.py to implement default ordering by created_at in descending order for both DeviceViewSet and ListCreateSpaceDeviceViewSet. For DeviceViewSet, ordering_fields was replaced with ordering. For ListCreateSpaceDeviceViewSet, OrderingFilter was added to filter_backends and ordering was set. The review feedback points out that enabling OrderingFilter without explicitly defining ordering_fields allows clients to order by any field, which could lead to performance issues if unindexed fields are used. It is also suggested to add a unique tie-breaker, such as id, to the default ordering for more stable pagination.

@ngovinh2k2 ngovinh2k2 merged commit 1b3b582 into dev Mar 26, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant