chore: list device display incorrect jump around#99
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an issue where device lists exhibited inconsistent ordering, leading to a 'jump around' effect in the display. The changes ensure a stable and predictable presentation of device data by explicitly setting a default descending order based on the creation timestamp for all relevant device listings. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request modifies apps/device/views.py to implement default ordering by created_at in descending order for both DeviceViewSet and ListCreateSpaceDeviceViewSet. For DeviceViewSet, ordering_fields was replaced with ordering. For ListCreateSpaceDeviceViewSet, OrderingFilter was added to filter_backends and ordering was set. The review feedback points out that enabling OrderingFilter without explicitly defining ordering_fields allows clients to order by any field, which could lead to performance issues if unindexed fields are used. It is also suggested to add a unique tie-breaker, such as id, to the default ordering for more stable pagination.
What?
List device display incorrect jump around
Why?
From the request
How?
Testing?
Anything Else?