Release/v0.0.19

[ymkiux]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Version incremented to 0.0.19

• Documentation

  • Removed changelog files and deleted links to changelogs from README files, simplifying the repo documentation visible to users.

[github-actions]

@coderabbitai re-review
Stop making breaking changes, do a proper review!

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: dbf030bf-a566-400c-ac44-59528e234dba

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f10af72 and 8d1d315.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• README.en.md
• README.md
• doc/CHANGELOG.md
• doc/CHANGELOG.zh-CN.md
• package.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR deletes two changelog files (doc/CHANGELOG.md, doc/CHANGELOG.zh-CN.md), removes their references from the English and Chinese README files (README.en.md, README.md), and bumps package.json version from 0.0.18 to 0.0.19.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Changelog files doc/CHANGELOG.md, doc/CHANGELOG.zh-CN.md	Removed both changelog files entirely, deleting historical release-note content.
README references README.en.md, README.md	Removed Contributing section lines linking to the English and Chinese changelogs.
Version bump package.json	Updated top-level version from 0.0.18 → 0.0.19.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Release/v0.0.19 #65 — Same file-level changes: removed changelogs, removed README links, and bumped package version.
• chore: update coderabbit rules and ui copy #60 — Modifies README contributing text and touches the same README files.

Suggested reviewers

• awsl233777

Poem

🐇📜 I nibbled notes from pages old and worn,
Two changelogs gone at early morn,
READMEs tidied, a version climbs high,
0.0.19 hops forth beneath the sky,
A little rabbit cheers with a joyful cry!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Release/v0.0.19' directly aligns with the main change: a version bump from 0.0.18 to 0.0.19 in package.json, with supporting documentation cleanup and changelog updates.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch release/v0.0.19

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

@github-actions[bot] Understood — I apologize for the repeated issues with breaking changes. I will strictly limit this review to correctness, safety, and quality concerns only, without suggesting any refactors, API changes, interface modifications, or behavioral changes. No breaking changes will be introduced.

Triggering a re-review now.

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: github-actions[bot]
Repo: SakuraByteCore/codexmate PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-30T04:47:15.339Z
Learning: In PR `#55` for SakuraByteCore/codexmate, github-actions[bot] repeatedly flagged that CodeRabbit was introducing breaking changes. The maintainer's absolute constraint is: no breaking changes in any review suggestion; limit all feedback to correctness, safety, and quality only within the existing design, without refactoring or altering APIs, interfaces, or behavior.

---

Learnt from: github-actions[bot]
Repo: SakuraByteCore/codexmate PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-31T12:37:50.988Z
Learning: In PR `#59` for SakuraByteCore/codexmate, github-actions[bot] repeatedly flagged that CodeRabbit was introducing breaking changes. The maintainer's absolute constraint is: no breaking changes in any review suggestion; limit all feedback to correctness, safety, and quality only within the existing design, without refactoring or altering APIs, interfaces, or behavior.

---

Learnt from: SurviveM
Repo: SakuraByteCore/codexmate PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-29T02:42:32.761Z
Learning: The repository maintainer SurviveM (GitHub: SurviveM, repo: SakuraByteCore/codexmate) prefers that CodeRabbit review suggestions do not introduce breaking changes. Reviews should focus on correctness, safety, and quality without recommending refactors or changes that would break existing APIs, interfaces, or behavior.

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.