Conversation
Member
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JIRA Task 🔖
고민되는 부분
ai_chat,chat_tab파일명, 변수명 등 이름으로 둘 중 무엇이 더 직관적이고 적절할까요?현재 채팅 이름에 대한 유효성 검사(공백, 길이, SQL 예약어, 특수문자 등)를 Pydantic 모델에 포함시켰습니다. 검증 로직이 과하다고 생각하는지, 아니면 보안을 위해 꼭 필요한 부분인지 궁금합니다.
현재 이름 길이를 255자로 제한하고 있는데, 일반적인 채팅 탭 이름으로는 너무 길지 않나 고민입니다. 더 짧은 길이로 제한하는 것이 UX 측면에서 더 좋을까요, 아니면 255자를 유지하며 유연성을 확보하는 것이 좋을까요?