Skip to content

NVIDIA/dgxc-benchmarking

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

42 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

DGX Cloud Benchmarking - Performance Recipes

Performance Recipes are ready-to-use templates for evaluating performance of specific AI use cases across hardware and software combinations. These containerized recipes allow users to quickly set up and run standardized benchmarking methodology in their own environment, ensuring consistent and comparable results across platforms.

These Performance Recipes support performance characterization

  • across a variety of defined AI workloads, including pre-training, fine tuning, and inference.
  • across GPU-based infrastructure, whether running on-premises or with cloud service providers (CSPs).

Each recipe maps to one workload and can be run at various cluster scales and precisions. These workloads are tested against the NVIDIA Reference Architecture and those results are provided as a baseline for comparison. These performance metrics are collected from production environments and are subject to real-world variability.

Prerequisites

To use the Performance Recipes, make sure you have the following prerequisites installed on your cluster:

General Prerequisites

  • Bash 4.2 or newer
  • Git LFS
  • NGC Registry Access
  • NGC CLI 3.148.1 or newer (Optional, required for NIM Inference workloads)
  • Python 3.12.x
  • CUDA: at least 12.3, recommended: 12.8 or newer
  • NV Driver: at least 535.129.03, recommended 570.172.08 or newer
  • OFED: 5.9-0.5.6.0.127 or newer
  • NCCL: 2.19.4 or newer

Cluster-Specific Prerequisites

Depending on your cluster's job scheduler, ensure the following are met:

  • Slurm Clusters
    • Version 22.x or newer
    • task/affinity plugin required for process pinning
    • Enroot 4.0.0 or newer
    • Pyxis

Quick Start Guide

Important: Before proceeding with installation, please review the Known Issues section.

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone https://github.com/NVIDIA/dgxc-benchmarking.git
    cd dgxc-benchmarking
  2. Set up Hugging Face access (required): Most recipes fetch model metadata (for example: tokenizer and config) from the Hugging Face Hub during installation. Unauthenticated access is heavily rate limited and commonly causes installation failures.

    • Create a Hugging Face account (if you don't have one)
    • Create an access token in Hugging Face settings
    • Keep the Hugging Face token handy. The installer will prompt for HF_TOKEN (if HF_TOKEN is already set in your environment, the installer will use it as the default)

    Gated model access (important): Some recipes use gated Hugging Face model repositories (for example: Llama). Even with HF_TOKEN, you must request repo access separately. Approvals are not instantaneous—request access early.

    See Model Access Requirements for the list of recipes that require additional approval.

  3. (Optional) For NIM Inference workloads only:

    • Generate an NGC API key from the NGC Registry
    • Install and configure the NGC CLI:
    x86
    curl -L https://ngc.nvidia.com/downloads/ngccli_linux.zip -o ngccli_linux.zip
    unzip -q ngccli_linux.zip -d $HOME/.local/bin
    rm ngccli_linux.zip
    export PATH=$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH
    ngc config set
    arm64
    curl -L https://ngc.nvidia.com/downloads/ngccli_arm64.zip -o ngccli_arm64.zip
    unzip -q ngccli_arm64.zip -d $HOME/.local/bin
    rm ngccli_arm64.zip
    export PATH=$HOME/.local/bin/ngc-cli:$PATH
    ngc config set
  4. Run the installer:

    Important: Installation may take several hours, influenced by selected recipes, internet speed, and your current node's resources. Consider using a tool like tmux or screen.

    This will set up a supported Python environment (reusing your current uv/venv/conda env if compatible, otherwise creating ../llmb_venv one directory above the repo), then launch the interactive installer.

    ./install.sh

    The installer will:

    • Install uv (the required package manager) if it is not already present
    • Set up a Python 3.12.x virtual environment (reusing your current one if compatible)
    • Install the CLI tools (llmb-run, llmb-install)
    • Prompt you to configure your cluster and select workloads to install

    Note: For detailed installation options, workload-specific virtual environments, and troubleshooting, see the Installer README.

  5. Run a benchmark:

    # Navigate to your installed workload directory
    cd $LLMB_INSTALL
    
    # Example: Run Llama 3.1 405B pretraining on 256 GPUs with FP8 precision
    llmb-run submit -w pretrain_llama3.1 -s 405b --dtype fp8 --scale 256
  6. (Optional) Package results for sharing:

    When you're ready to share results — for example, as part of Exemplar Cloud certification — bundle all experiment data into a single archive:

    llmb-run archive

    See the llmb-run README for details and options.

Shell Completion (Optional)

Enable tab completion for llmb-run commands and options:

llmb-run --install-completion

Restart your shell after installation for changes to take effect.

Directory Layout and Key Variables

After running the installer, the following directory structure is created:

  • LLMB_REPO: Directory containing the clone of the recipe repository.
  • LLMB_INSTALL: Top-level directory for all benchmarking artifacts (images, datasets, venvs, workloads, etc).
  • LLMB_WORKLOAD: Workload-specific directory, e.g. ${LLMB_INSTALL}/workloads/pretrain_nemotron4.
  • Results, logs, and checkpoints are stored under subfolders of LLMB_WORKLOAD (see below).

Example structure:

$LLMB_INSTALL/
  ├── images/
  ├── datasets/
  ├── venvs/
  └── workloads/
        └── pretrain_nemotron4/   # <- $LLMB_WORKLOAD
              ├── NeMo/
              ├── ...
              └── experiments/

LLMB_REPO, LLMB_INSTALL, and LLMB_WORKLOAD are shorthand terms for directory locations; LLMB_INSTALL is the only environment variable that needs to be set by the user.

Workload Resources Overview

Each workload resource includes:

  • Configuration details: Comprehensive software and hardware setup information.
  • Performance scripts: Predefined scripts to generate and analyze performance results.

The overview page for each workload highlights target performance metrics for the specified configuration, focusing on speed measurements such as the time taken per training step and the number of tokens processed per second.

Available Benchmarks

The following tables list each benchmark used to evaluate the model's performance, along with their specific configurations.

Note: The "Scale (# of GPUs)" column indicates the minimum supported scale and the maximum scale tested for each workload. The recipes may function at larger scales (unless otherwise noted in workload specific README), although they have not been explicitly validated beyond the listed maximum.

GB300 Workloads

Type Framework Model Container Version Model Size Scale (# of GPUs) Precision Model Access Required Checkpointing Cluster Type
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge GPT OSS 120B 26.02.00 120B 64-512 BF16 No No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge DeepSeek V3 26.02.00 671B 128-512 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 405B 256-512 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 70B 64-512 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 8B 8-128 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 235B 256-512 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 30B 8-64 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.09.00 15B 16-256 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.09.00 340B 128-512 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Grok1 25.09.00 314B 128-512 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Nemotron-H 26.02.00 56B 32-512 FP8 No No Slurm
Finetune Megatron-Bridge Llama 3 26.02.00 70B 8-16 BF16, FP8 Yes No Slurm
Microbenchmark TRT-LLM GPT-OSS 1.1.0rc5 120B 1-4 MXFP4 Yes No Slurm

GB200 Workloads

Type Framework Model Container Version Model Size Scale (# of GPUs) Precision Model Access Required Checkpointing Cluster Type
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge GPT OSS 120B 26.02.00 120B 64-512 BF16 No No Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.09.00 15B 16-256 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.07.01 340B 128-512 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 405B 256-512 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 70B 64-512 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 8B 8-128 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 235B 256-512 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 30B 8-64 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge DeepSeek V3 26.02.00 671B 256-512 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain TorchTitan DeepSeek V3 25.12-py3 671B 256 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Grok1 25.09.00 314B 128-512 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Nemotron-H 26.02.00 56B 32-512 FP8 No No Slurm
Finetune Megatron-Bridge Llama 3 26.02.00 70B 8-16 BF16, FP8 Yes No Slurm
Inference TRT-LLM DeepSeek R1 1.1.0rc5 671B 4 NVFP4 No No Slurm
Inference Dynamo DeepSeek R1 0.6.1 671B 32 NVFP4 No No Slurm
Inference SGLang DeepSeek R1 v0.5.3-cu129-gb200 671B 4 NVFP4 No No Slurm
Inference TRT-LLM Llama 3.3 1.1.0rc5 70b 1-4 NVFP4 Yes No Slurm
Inference Dynamo + TRT-LLM GPT-OSS Inference 0.5.1-rc0.pre3 120B 4+ MXFP4 No No Kubernetes
Inference Dynamo + TRT-LLM GPT-OSS 0.5.1-rc0.pre3 120B 4 MXFP4 No No Slurm
Microbenchmark TRT-LLM GPT-OSS 1.1.0rc5 120B 1-4 MXFP4 Yes No Slurm

B300 Workloads

Type Framework Model Container Version Model Size Scale (# of GPUs) Precision Model Access Required Checkpointing Cluster Type
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge GPT OSS 120B 26.02.00 120B 64-512 BF16 No No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge DeepSeek V3 26.02.00 671B 128-512 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 405B 256-512 FP8 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 70B 64-512 FP8 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 235B 256-512 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 30B 8-64 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Nemotron-H 26.02.00 56B 32-512 FP8 No No Slurm

B200 Workloads

Type Framework Model Container Version Model Size Scale (# of GPUs) Precision Model Access Required Checkpointing Cluster Type
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge GPT OSS 120B 26.02.00 120B 64-512 BF16 No No Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.09.00 15B 16-256 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.07.01 340B 128-1024 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 405B 256-1024 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 70B 64-1024 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 8B 8-128 FP8, NVFP4 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 235B 256-512 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 30B 8-64 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge DeepSeek V3 26.02.00 671B 256-512 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain TorchTitan DeepSeek V3 25.12-py3 671B 256 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Grok1 25.09.00 314B 256-1024 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Nemotron-H 26.02.00 56B 32-512 FP8 No No Slurm
Inference TRT-LLM DeepSeek R1 1.1.0rc5 671B 4 NVFP4 No No Slurm
Inference Dynamo DeepSeek R1 0.6.1 671B 32 NVFP4 No No Slurm
Inference SGLang DeepSeek R1 v0.5.3rc0-cu128-b200 671B 8 NVFP4 No No Slurm
Inference TRT-LLM Llama 3.3 1.1.0rc5 70b 1 NVFP4 Yes No Slurm
Inference Dynamo + TRT-LLM GPT-OSS 0.6.1 120B 4 MXFP4 No No Slurm
Microbenchmark TRT-LLM GPT-OSS 1.1.0rc5 120B 1-4 MXFP4 Yes No Slurm

H100 Workloads

Baseline performance metrics were collected using workloads on the NVIDIA DGX H100 Reference Architecture. For more information see DGX H100 Systems.

Type Framework Model Container Version Model Size Scale (# of GPUs) Precision Model Access Required Checkpointing Cluster Type
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge GPT OSS 120B 26.02.00 120B 64-1024 BF16 No No Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.09.00 15B 16-256 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Nemotron4 25.09.00 340B 256-2048 FP8, BF16 No Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 405B 1024 BF16, FP8 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 70B 64-1024 BF16, FP8 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Llama 3.1 26.02.00 8B 8-128 BF16, FP8 Yes Yes Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 235B 256-512 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Qwen3 26.02.00 30B 16-64 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge DeepSeek V3 25.09.00 671B 512-1024 FP8 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge DeepSeek V3 25.09.00 671B 1024 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain TorchTitan DeepSeek V3 25.12-py3 671B 512-1024 BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain NeMo Grok1 25.09.00 314B 512-2048 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm
Pretrain Megatron-Bridge Nemotron-H 26.02.00 56B 32-1024 FP8 No No Slurm
Finetune Megatron-Bridge Llama 3 26.02.00 70B 8-16 BF16, FP8 Yes No Slurm
Inference TRT-LLM DeepSeek R1 1.1.0rc5 671B 16 FP8 No No Slurm
Inference Dynamo DeepSeek R1 0.6.1 671B 48 FP8 No No Slurm
Inference TRT-LLM Llama 3.3 1.1.0rc5 70b 2 FP8 Yes No Slurm
Microbenchmark TRT-LLM GPT-OSS 1.1.0rc5 120B 1-4 MXFP4 Yes No Slurm

Deprecated

Type Framework Model Container Version Model Size Scale (# of GPUs) Precision Model Access Required Checkpointing Cluster Type Last Version
Finetuning HF Llama 2 24.02-py3 70B 8-512 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm 25.01.1
Finetuning HF Mistral 24.02-py3 7B 8-256 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm 25.01.1
Pretrain Jax Llama 2 jax:maxtext-2024-12-09 70B 128-2048 FP8, BF16 No No Slurm 25.01.1
Pretrain Jax GPT3 jax:pax-2024-03-04 175B 128-2048 FP8, BF16 No No Slurm 25.01.1
Pretrain Maxtext Llama3 25.01 70B 128-2048 FP8, BF16 No No Slurm 25.04.02
Pretrain NeMo GPT3 24.12 175B 128-2048 FP8, BF16 No No Slurm 25.04.02
Pretrain NeMo Llama4 Maverick 25.07.01 400B 512-2048 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm 25.08
Fine-Tuning (SFT, LORA) NeMo Llama 3 24.12 8B, 70B 8-32 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm 25.04.02
Finetune NeMo Maverick Llama4 25.07.01 400B 256 FP8, BF16 Yes No Slurm 25.08
Inference NIM Llama 3 1.0.3 70B 4 FP8 Yes No Slurm 25.05.04
Inference NIM, SGLang DeepSeek R1 1.7.2 671B 16 FP8 No No Slurm 25.08
Inference NIM & NeMo Retriever (NVIDIA Enterprise RAG) Llama 3.1 and 3.2 instruct:1.3.3, rerank:1.3, embed:1.3.1 70b, 1b 1-8 N/A Yes No Slurm 25.08
Inference TRT-LLM Llama 4 1.0.0rc1 17b 8 FP8 Yes No Slurm 25.08

Model Access Requirements

Most recipes require a Hugging Face account and HF_TOKEN to fetch model metadata (tokenizer/config) from the Hugging Face Hub without running into strict unauthenticated rate limits.

Some recipes additionally require approval for gated model repositories. In those cases, the token is necessary but not sufficient — your Hugging Face account must also be granted access to the model repo.

Note: approval processes are not immediate and may take some time.

Recipe Type Recipe Name HF Token Required Additional Approval Required Details/Link for Approval
Pretrain GPT OSS 120B Yes No HuggingFace GPT OSS 120B
Pretrain Llama 3.1 Yes Yes HuggingFace Llama 3.1
Pretrain DeepSeek V3 Yes No N/A
Pretrain Grok1 Yes Yes HuggingFace Llama 3
Pretrain Nemotron4 Yes No N/A
Pretrain Qwen3 235B Yes No HuggingFace Qwen3 235B
Pretrain Qwen3 30B Yes No HuggingFace Qwen3 30B
Pretrain Nemotron-H No No N/A
Finetune Llama 3 Yes Yes HuggingFace Llama 3 70B
Inference Llama 3.3 Yes Yes HuggingFace Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Inference DeepSeek R1 Yes No N/A
Inference GPT-OSS Yes No HuggingFace GPT OSS 120B
Microbenchmark CPU overhead Yes No HuggingFace GPT-OSS-120B

Reference Infrastructure

The LLM Benchmarking Collection published baseline benchmark results using the following reference infrastructures, CSP-specific configurations, and software.

Peak Theoretical Throughput

The following table shows the peak theoretical throughput (in TFLOPS) for different GPU types and data types. These values represent the maximum computational capacity of each GPU architecture and are used for calculating Model FLOPS Utilization (MFU) in performance analysis.

Data Type GB300 GB200 B300 B200 H100
BF16 2450 2450 2250 2250 989
FP8 4900 4900 4500 4500 1979
NVFP4 14700 9800 13500 9000 -

Note: These peak theoretical throughput values are based on non-sparse specifications and referenced throughout individual recipe README files for MFU calculations and performance analysis. NVFP4 precision is not supported on Hopper architecture (H100).

GB300 Reference Architecture

Baseline performance metrics for GB300 workloads were collected using systems equipped with the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Superchip. For more information see NVIDIA Blackwell Platform.

  • GB300 Grace Blackwell Superchip
    • CPU: 72 Arm Neoverse V2 cores with 4x 128b SVE2
      • 3.5 GHz (max boost)
      • Low-latency coherent interconnect between Grace CPU and B300 GPUs
      • RAM: 960 GiB LPDDR5X (2x 480 GiB) | 546 GB/s
      • Total Accessible Memory: 2 TiB
      • 64x PCIe Gen5 lanes
    • 2x B300 GPUs
      • 279 GB HBM3e per GPU
      • TDP configurable up to 1,400 W
      • Memory bandwidth 8 TB/s per GPU
  • NVLink: NVLink 5th Generation
    • 1.8 TB/s per GPU bandwidth
  • System Memory: Coherent memory architecture between Grace CPU and Blackwell GPUs

GB200 Reference Architecture

Baseline performance metrics for GB200 workloads were collected using the NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 Reference Architecture. For more information see NVIDIA GB200 NVL72

  • GB200 Grace Blackwell Superchip
    • CPU: 72 Arm Neoverse V2 cores with 4x 128b SVE2
      • 3.5 GHz (max boost)
      • Low-latency coherent interconnect between Grace CPU and B200 GPUs
      • RAM: 960 GiB LPDDR5X (2x 480 GiB) | 546 GB/s
      • Total Accessible Memory: 1.7 TiB
      • 64x PCIe Gen5 lanes
    • 2x B200 GPUs
      • 186 GB HBM3e per GPU
      • Memory bandwidth 8 TB/s per GPU
  • NVLink: NVLink 5th Generation
    • 1.8 TB/s per GPU bandwidth

B300 Reference Architecture

Baseline performance metrics for B300 workloads were collected using systems equipped with NVIDIA B300 GPUs. For more information see NVIDIA DGX B300.

  • GPU: 8xB300 270 GB HBM3e (2.1 TB total)
    • TDP 1100W
    • Memory bandwidth 7.7 TB/s per GPU
  • CPU: Intel Xeon 6776P x2
    • 64 cores per socket
    • 3.9 GHz (max turbo) / 4.6 GHz (priority core turbo, up to 8 cores)
    • RAM: 2 TB DDR5
    • PCIe Gen5
  • NVLink: NVLink 5th Generation
    • 1.8 TB/s per GPU bandwidth
  • SpectrumX:
    • Compute links: 8x 800 Gbit/s
  • System Memory: 2TB
  • Local Storage:
    • 2x 1.9TB NVMe M.2
    • 8x 3.84TB NVMe E1.S

B200 Reference Architecture

Baseline performance metrics for B200 workloads were collected using systems equipped with NVIDIA B200 GPUs. For more information see NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture.

  • GPU: 8xB200 180 GB HBM3e (1.4 TB total)
    • TDP 1000W
    • Memory bandwidth 7.7 TB/s per GPU
  • CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8570 x2
    • 56 cores per socket
    • 4 GHz (max boost)
    • RAM: 1 TiB | 1.6 TB/s per socket
    • 48x PCIe Gen5 lanes
  • NVLink: NVLink 5th Generation
    • 1.8 TB/s per GPU bandwidth
    • 18 Links per GPU
  • InfiniBand:
    • Compute links: 8x 400 Gbit/s
  • System Memory: 2TB

H100 Reference Architecture

Baseline performance metrics for H100 workloads were collected using the NVIDIA DGX H100 Reference Architecture. For more information see DGX H100 Systems.

  • GPU: 8xH100 80 GB HBM3 (640 GB total)
    • TDP 700W
    • Memory bandwidth 3.2 TB/s per GPU
  • CPU: 2x Intel Sapphire Rapids, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480C
    • 112 cores (56 cores per CPU)
    • 2.00 GHz (Base), 3.8 GHz (Max boost)
    • Numa nodes per socket = 1
    • PCIe Gen5
  • NVLink: NVLink 4th Generation
    • 900 GB/s per GPU bandwidth
    • 18 Links per GPU
  • InfiniBand:
    • Compute links: 8x 400 Gbit/s
    • Storage links: 2x 400 Gbit/s
  • System Memory: 2TB
  • Local Storage:
    • 2x 1.92TB NVMe M.2
    • 8x 3.84TB NVMe U.2

CSP Specific Configurations

AI platforms may vary in implementation, such as differences in network fabric and virtualization implementations, and thus require different tuning. For optimal performance, users should leverage the correct implementation for their platform. The example platform-specific tuning is provided as a starting point. Further tuning may be necessary if instance type varies from the Reference Architecture.

AWS

For NeMo based images EFA support is already included starting with version 25.02 (nvcr.io/nvidia/nemo:25.02).

For other images or if you need to update Enable Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA) follow the step-by-step guide. Use the reference NCCL tests Dockerfile with EFA support.

GCP

Ensure that all required pre-conditions for GCP cluster deployment have been met.

Configure Compute Fabric with TCP-X by ensuring the following environment variables are set and present for your environment.

NCCL_LIB_DIR='/var/lib/tcpxo/lib64' source /var/lib/tcpxo/lib64/nccl-env-profile.sh; \
	  export NCCL_FASTRAK_CTRL_DEV=enp0s12; \
	  export NCCL_FASTRAK_IFNAME=enp6s0,enp7s0,enp13s0,enp14s0,enp134s0,enp135s0,enp141s0,enp142s0; \
	  export NCCL_SOCKET_IFNAME=enp0s12; \
	  export NCCL_FASTRAK_LLCM_DEVICE_DIRECTORY=/dev/aperture_devices; \
	  export NCCL_NET=FasTrak; \
	  ls /var/lib/tcpxo/lib64;"

Important:

  • The above example hasn't been tested with the latest TCP-X version. Check with your cluster admin for the most recent instructions.
  • If additional files need to be mounted into running container, they should be placed under $LLMB_WORKLOAD folder as this location is already mounted.

Azure

Requires two settings for optimal performance:

  1. NCCL_TOPO_FILE=<path to topo file under $LLMB_WORKLOAD>.
    • The VM topology files ensure that the correct CPUs, GPUs and NICs are bound together. Location of this file varies, it must be mounted into the container.
    • Important: Place NCCL Topology file under $LLMB_WORKLOAD folder as this location is already mounted into running container.
  2. NCCL_P2P_CHUNKSIZE=2097152
    • Increasing message size for NCCL send/recv for optimal performance

Example Configuration for a training recipe:

export NCCL_TOPO_FILE=$LLMB_WORKLOAD/nvd5-topo.xml # Exact location varies by cluster
export NCCL_P2P_NET_CHUNKSIZE=2097152

Release Notes

For the latest updates, improvements, and breaking changes, see the CHANGELOG.

FAQ

Contains synopsis and resolution for known issues

1. Training logs contain multiple userbuffers.cu messages

Symptom

Large scale pre-training run logs contain message like below:

[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 18 [2]: expecting 1 got 0
[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 18 [4]: expecting 1 got 0
[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 19 [2]: expecting 1 got 0
[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 19 [4]: expecting 1 got 0
[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 22 [2]: expecting 1 got 0
[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 22 [4]: expecting 1 got 0
[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 23 [2]: expecting 1 got 0
[userbuffers.cu:userbuffers_fp16_sum_inplace_gpu_rr_rs_oop_fp8:797] [6] Reduce-scatter: SM 23 [4]: expecting 1 got 0

Solution

These usually mean that one of the GPUs is hanging. Possible resolutions:

  • re-running the job on a different set of nodes
  • rebooting affected nodes.

2. Slurm job failed, need to find log files

Symptom

A Slurm job failed during benchmark run. E.g., a nemotron benchmark job with ID=2041792 failed

sacct -j 2041792
JobID           JobName  Partition    Account  AllocCPUS      State ExitCode
------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------
2041792        launch.sh     batch test              224     FAILED      1:0
2041792.bat+      batch            test              224     FAILED      1:0
2041792.ext+     extern            test              224  COMPLETED      0:0
2041792.0          bash            test              224     FAILED      1:0

Solution

NeMo2 (e.g., Nemotron4)

You can find log files associated with this run under $LLMB_WORKLOAD/experiments/pretrain_nemotron4_<size>_<dtype>_<scale>_<config> folder. The folder will have subfolders that will contain log-account.pretrain_nemotron4_<size>_<dtype>_<scale>_<config>.out files with a root cause error message.

E.g., for the job failure above and assuming the nemotron 15b job ran on 16 GPUs, used version 25.05, and with precision bf16 the path will be under $LLMB_WORKLOAD/experiments/pretrain_nemotron4_15b_bf16_gpus16_tp1_pp1_cp1_vp1_mbs2_gbs64/...

Search for errors in the log-account.pretrain_nemotron4_15b_bf16_gpus16_tp1_pp1_cp1_vp1_mbs2_gbs64_3358926_0.out file.

3. Unable to use venv required by benchmark

Symptom

If a benchmark requires virtual python environment (venv) but virtualenv executable isn't available on the login node and/or login nodes cannot be updated by non-sudo users, you would see errors like below when trying to setup venv

bash-5.2$ virtualenv
bash: virtualenv: command not found

Solution

There are alternative virtual environment options available like conda.

To install and activate conda virtual environment

# pick INSTALL_PATH with sufficient disk space
INSTALL_PATH=~
wget -q https://repo.anaconda.com/miniconda/Miniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh -O $INSTALL_PATH/miniconda.sh
bash $INSTALL_PATH/miniconda.sh -b -p $INSTALL_PATH/miniconda3
$INSTALL_PATH/miniconda3/bin/conda init
source ~/.bashrc

When you are finished running this benchmark you can deactivate the environment, run this command

conda deactivate

4. NCCL InfiniBand QPS tuning

Some recipes set NCCL_IB_QPS_PER_CONNECTION=4 by default. This controls the number of InfiniBand queue pairs NCCL uses per connection and can improve multi-node communication performance on certain cluster configurations.

If you need to set or override this value, there are two options:

Option A — Add it to the environment section of your cluster_config.yaml (applies to all jobs launched from that installation):

environment:
  NCCL_IB_QPS_PER_CONNECTION: 4

Option B — Pass it inline when submitting a single job:

NCCL_IB_QPS_PER_CONNECTION=4 llmb-run submit -w <workload> -s <size> --dtype <precision> --scale <number>

Note: The optimal value may vary by cluster and workload. If you experience communication errors or degraded performance after changing this setting, try removing it or adjusting the value.

Known Issues

1. Multiple GPU Types on Single Cluster

Issue

The llmb-install tool currently supports only one GPU type per installation. If your cluster contains multiple GPU types (e.g., H100 and B200), you cannot install workloads for both GPU types in a single installation.

Workaround

Create separate installations for each GPU type:

  1. Run the installer once for your first GPU type (e.g., H100):

    ./install.sh
    # Select H100 workloads and specify an installation directory
  2. Run the installer again for your second GPU type (e.g., B200):

    ./install.sh
    # Select B200 workloads and specify a different installation directory

Each installation will have its own LLMB_INSTALL directory. Use the appropriate LLMB_INSTALL directory for running workloads for each GPU type.

2. Cleanup-phase errors after successful run

Issue

Some workloads complete all timesteps but print errors during the cleanup phase. This previously caused the Slurm job to be marked as failed.

Workaround

We now detect this case and convert the exit code so Slurm reports success when the run actually finished. Log files will still contain the cleanup errors. If the job completed all timesteps and Slurm shows COMPLETED, you can ignore cleanup errors in the logs. This will be fixed in a future release.

3. uv 0.9.29+ breaks all recipes that use nemo_run

Issue

Nearly every recipe installs nemo_run and will fail with uv 0.9.29+ due to uv rejecting unknown fields in pyproject.toml files.

Workaround

Run ./install.sh from this release. It enforces uv <=0.9.28, which avoids the strict parser breakage.

4. EFA broken with 26.02.00 NeMo container due to library conflict

Issue

The nvcr.io/nvidia/nemo:26.02.00 container ships a bundled rdma-core (/opt/rdma-core/build/lib/) that conflicts with the container's own EFA libraries, causing NCCL to fall back to Socket transport.

Note: the container also ships aws-ofi-nccl 1.17.0, which has a known memory leak (fixed in 1.17.3). We have not observed this issue with our recipes using default settings, but it may surface with non-default configurations.

See Megatron-Bridge #2824 for details.

Workaround

This only affects recipes using the nvcr.io/nvidia/nemo:26.02.00 container. Not all recipes or GPU types use this container — check the FW_VERSION in your recipe's launch.sh before applying.

Create a patched container image by removing the conflicting library directory:

srun -N1 --container-image=$LLMB_INSTALL/images/nvidia+nemo+26.02.00.sqsh \
     --container-save=$LLMB_INSTALL/images/nvidia+nemo+26.02.00-efa-fix.sqsh \
     --pty /bin/bash
# Inside the container:
rm -rf /opt/rdma-core/build/lib/
ldconfig
exit

Then update the affected recipe's launch.sh under your install directory ($LLMB_INSTALL/llmb_repo/**/launch.sh, not the source repo) to use the patched image:

# Before:
export IMAGE=${RUN_CONF_IMAGE:-$LLMB_INSTALL/images/nvidia+nemo+$FW_VERSION.sqsh}

# After:
export IMAGE=${RUN_CONF_IMAGE:-$LLMB_INSTALL/images/nvidia+nemo+26.02.00-efa-fix.sqsh}

5. DeepSeek V3 671B and Qwen3 235B not supported on EFA

Issue

Both models fail after approximately 12-13 training iterations on EFA clusters:

  • Qwen3 235B — NCCL OFI memory registration exhaustion (NET/OFI Failed to allocate schedule)
  • DeepSeek V3 671B — inter-node communication hang (DeepEP timeout check failed). Additionally requires NVSHMEM to be rebuilt with libfabric transport support just to initialize on EFA, but training still hangs even with this fix applied.

Workaround

There is no workaround. These workloads are not supported on EFA clusters.

Support

Terminology used in these recipes is explained in the Appendix.

For questions or to provide feedback, please contact LLMBenchmarks@nvidia.com

About

DGXC Benchmarking provides recipes in ready-to-use templates for evaluating performance of specific AI use cases across hardware and software combinations.

Resources

License

Code of conduct

Security policy

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages