Skip to content

Rewrite README intro with value proposition and roadmap#2

Open
ZmeiGorynych wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
egor/readme
Open

Rewrite README intro with value proposition and roadmap#2
ZmeiGorynych wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
egor/readme

Conversation

@ZmeiGorynych
Copy link
Member

@ZmeiGorynych ZmeiGorynych commented Mar 25, 2026

Surface the problem SLayer solves (raw SQL from agents, heavy existing semantic layers) and highlight key differentiators: auto-ingestion, dynamic models, query-time expressions, and time operations.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README to emphasize that SLayer empowers AI agents to query databases without writing SQL.
    • Added introductory sections detailing core capabilities including automatic schema ingestion, FK-aware denormalized joins, runtime model manipulation, query-time metric composition, and composable time operations.
    • Included roadmap of upcoming features.

Surface the problem SLayer solves (raw SQL from agents, heavy existing
semantic layers) and highlight key differentiators: auto-ingestion,
dynamic models, query-time expressions, and time operations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md was updated with an enhanced top-level description emphasizing SLayer's capability to enable AI agents to query data without SQL. New introductory sections were added covering the problem, SLayer's differentiation through automatic schema ingestion and composable operations, and an upcoming features roadmap.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Updated top-level description and added "The problem", "What SLayer does differently", and "Roadmap" sections. Highlights automatic schema ingestion, FK-aware joins, runtime model manipulation, query-time metric composition, and composable time operations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A README so bright, now shines with new light,
SLayer's magic unveiled, no SQL in sight!
AI agents shall query with ease and with grace,
While composable time operations embrace the space! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: rewriting the README introduction to include value proposition and roadmap sections.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch egor/readme

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 12: Change the "### The problem" heading to an H2 by replacing "### The
problem" with "## The problem" and likewise adjust the other new section
headings referenced (the headings at lines showing new sections, e.g., the
headings currently using "###" around the README content) to use one-level-lower
numbers so the document increments heading levels sequentially (H1 -> H2 -> H3),
ensuring all new headings follow the MD001 rule.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c030066e-819c-417a-a0dc-2b7bc9698c4a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e7a306 and 243f187.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md


---

### The problem
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix heading level to follow markdown hierarchy.

The heading jumps from h1 to h3, skipping h2. Per markdown best practices (MD001), headings should increment by one level at a time.

📝 Proposed fix
-### The problem
+## The problem

Apply the same fix to the other new section headings on lines 16 and 23.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
### The problem
## The problem
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.21.0)

[warning] 12-12: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@README.md` at line 12, Change the "### The problem" heading to an H2 by
replacing "### The problem" with "## The problem" and likewise adjust the other
new section headings referenced (the headings at lines showing new sections,
e.g., the headings currently using "###" around the README content) to use
one-level-lower numbers so the document increments heading levels sequentially
(H1 -> H2 -> H3), ensuring all new headings follow the MD001 rule.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant