Skip to content

[draft] cluster: Update peeks#35236

Draft
bkirwi wants to merge 2 commits intoMaterializeInc:mainfrom
bkirwi:update-peeks
Draft

[draft] cluster: Update peeks#35236
bkirwi wants to merge 2 commits intoMaterializeInc:mainfrom
bkirwi:update-peeks

Conversation

@bkirwi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bkirwi bkirwi commented Feb 26, 2026

Remove these sections if your commit already has a good description!

Motivation

Why does this change exist? Link to a GitHub issue, design doc, Slack
thread, or explain the problem in a sentence or two. A reviewer who has
no context should understand why after reading this section.

If this implements or addresses an existing issue, it's enough to link to that:
Closes
Fixes
etc.

Description

What does this PR actually do? Focus on the approach and any non-obvious
decisions. The diff shows the code --- use this space to explain what the
diff can't tell a reviewer.

Verification

How do you know this change is correct? Describe new or existing automated
tests, or manual steps you took.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for opening this PR! Here are a few tips to help make the review process smooth for everyone.

PR title guidelines

  • Use imperative mood: "Fix X" not "Fixed X" or "Fixes X"
  • Be specific: "Fix panic in catalog sync when controller restarts" not "Fix bug" or "Update catalog code"
  • Prefix with area if helpful: compute: , storage: , adapter: , sql:

Pre-merge checklist

  • The PR title is descriptive and will make sense in the git log.
  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).

@bkirwi bkirwi force-pushed the update-peeks branch 16 times, most recently from c8a8812 to fe4664f Compare March 31, 2026 23:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant