Update description of MIXS:0000127 in mixs.yaml#987
Update description of MIXS:0000127 in mixs.yaml#987only1chunts wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
LinkML Linting ResultsSummary
Problems per Schema/home/runner/work/mixs/mixs/src/mixs/schema/mixs.yamlErrors
|
|
src/mixs/schema/mixs.yaml
Outdated
| characteristics. In crude oil a high pour point is generally associated with | ||
| characteristics. In crude oil a high pour point is generally associated with | ||
| a high paraffin content, typically found in crude deriving from a larger proportion | ||
| of plant material. (soure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pour_point)' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i think there's a specific LinkML slot for definition sources. Looking now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To do: can we move the wikipedia page link to the appropriate metaslot for this slot see_also
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
src/mixs/schema/mixs.yaml
Outdated
| characteristics. In crude oil a high pour point is generally associated with | ||
| characteristics. In crude oil a high pour point is generally associated with | ||
| a high paraffin content, typically found in crude deriving from a larger proportion | ||
| of plant material. (soure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pour_point)' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description still contains a typo in the citation label: "(soure: ...)" should be "(source: ...)" to match the intended fix for MIXS:0000127 / issue #986.
| of plant material. (soure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pour_point)' | |
| of plant material. (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pour_point)' |
|
I requested Copilot reviews here because I’m helping triage/review MIxS PRs, not because I authored them. If you have the same GitHub permissions and Copilot access, you can do the same on any PR. You’ll know you’re enabled if you can see the Copilot review option in the PR review UI or related actions; if not, you likely need org/repo access and a Copilot seat or feature enablement from the repo or GitHub org admins. |
|
We've requested a GitHub Copilot review on this PR as part of a pass across all open MixS PRs. Copilot catches things like unused imports, resource leaks, and naming inconsistencies — it's a lightweight first pass, not a substitute for human review. No action needed from you unless Copilot flags something you agree with. |
Co-authored-by: Mark Andrew Miller <MAM@lbl.gov>
|
@turbomam can you help with the merge conflicts? |
close #986