Better cardinality estimation for queries with many booleans (especially those not matched to any indices)#8940
Open
Better cardinality estimation for queries with many booleans (especially those not matched to any indices)#8940
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In real-world SQL queries, conjuncts (ANDed booleans) are often inter-dependent and simple multiplication of selectivities (that we used so far) results to a very low final selectivity value, thus causing the stream cardinality being under-estimated. To avoid this, apply exponential backoff adjustment:
I don't pretend this is the best appoach possible, but it seems working fine for MSSQL, so it's worth trying (actually, it was already tested in production -- with quite good results so far).