Change from stateful set to deployment

[ZohebShaikh]

closes #200

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.35%. Comparing base (8575746) to head (0a4b2ef).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #257   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.35%   76.35%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1937     1937           
=======================================
  Hits         1479     1479           
  Misses        458      458           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ZohebShaikh]

The container build image Is failing because I have given a PR from a fork

I have tested this on p46 And I could not find any significant difference between using Deployment and statefulset

The deployment pod was back in 4 seconds and the stateful set was back in about 10 seconds

[tpoliaw]

I'm still unsure if this is required/the best way of doing it but we can try it in staging and see how it gets on

[tpoliaw]

The deployment pod was back in 4 seconds

Presumably the previous pod was still functional until the new one was up? If it wasn't, there isn't much benefit to this change.