Skip to content

[management] Code generation: update services and models#458

Open
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/management
Open

[management] Code generation: update services and models#458
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/management

Conversation

@AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR contains the automated changes for the management service.

The commit history of this PR reflects the adyen-openapi commits that have been applied.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested review from a team as code owners March 20, 2026 10:37
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request contains automated updates to the management service, primarily focusing on code style and formatting. The changes ensure a consistent and cleaner codebase by reordering imports and compacting multi-line API calls into single lines, enhancing overall code readability and maintainability without altering functionality.

Highlights

  • Code Formatting: API call formatting was standardized across numerous files, removing unnecessary line breaks for improved readability and conciseness.
  • Import Reordering: Imports within the __init__.py file were reordered to maintain consistency and adhere to standard Python style guidelines.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request primarily refactors Python code for improved readability and consistency by reordering import statements alphabetically and condensing multi-line function calls into single lines across various API service files. The review comments consistently suggest a minor optimization: replacing f-strings with plain string concatenation for static endpoint paths, as f-strings are redundant and slightly less efficient in these specific cases.

Get a list of company accounts
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/companies"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/companies"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/companies" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/companies"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/companies"

Create a merchant account
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/merchants"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/merchants"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/merchants" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/merchants"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/merchants"

Get a list of merchant accounts
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/merchants"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/merchants"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/merchants" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/merchants"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/merchants"

Create a store
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/stores"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/stores"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/stores" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/stores"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/stores"

Get a list of stores
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/stores"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/stores"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/stores" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/stores"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/stores"

Generate a client key
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/me/generateClientKey"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/me/generateClientKey"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/me/generateClientKey" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/me/generateClientKey"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/me/generateClientKey"

Get allowed origins
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/me/allowedOrigins"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/me/allowedOrigins"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/me/allowedOrigins" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/me/allowedOrigins"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/me/allowedOrigins"

Get API credential details
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/me"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/me"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/me" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/me"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/me"

Create a terminal action
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/terminals/scheduleActions"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/terminals/scheduleActions"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/terminals/scheduleActions" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/terminals/scheduleActions"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/terminals/scheduleActions"

Get a list of terminals
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/terminals"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/terminals"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using an f-string for a static string like "/terminals" is redundant. While not incorrect, a plain string is sufficient and slightly more efficient as it avoids unnecessary f-string processing.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/terminals"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/terminals"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant