Skip to content

[binlookup] Code generation: update services and models#451

Open
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/binlookup
Open

[binlookup] Code generation: update services and models#451
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/binlookup

Conversation

@AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR contains the automated changes for the binlookup service.

The commit history of this PR reflects the adyen-openapi commits that have been applied.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested review from a team as code owners March 20, 2026 10:37
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request delivers an automated update to the binlookup service, ensuring its codebase aligns with the most recent API specifications. The primary change involves a minor refactor in how endpoint URLs are constructed, enhancing code clarity without altering functionality. This update is part of a routine code generation process to maintain synchronization with upstream API changes.

Highlights

  • Automated Code Generation Update: The binlookup service code has been updated through an automated process, reflecting the latest API definitions.
  • Endpoint String Formatting: The method for constructing API endpoint URLs was updated from string concatenation (+) to f-strings for improved readability and modern Python syntax.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, generated automatically, introduces some stylistic regressions. The endpoint URL construction now uses f-strings unnecessarily on static strings, which is confusing. A better approach would be to use f-strings to format the entire URL. Additionally, some function calls have been flattened into a single line, exceeding recommended line lengths and harming readability. I've added specific comments with suggestions to revert to a more readable multi-line format and use f-strings more effectively.

Check if 3D Secure is available
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/get3dsAvailability"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/get3dsAvailability"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The use of an f-string on a static string f"/get3dsAvailability" is unnecessary as it provides no formatting. For improved readability and to make the string formatting intention clear, it's better to format the entire URL endpoint using an f-string.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/get3dsAvailability"
endpoint = f"{self.baseUrl}/get3dsAvailability"

return self.client.call_adyen_api(
request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs
)
return self.client.call_adyen_api(request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This line is over 120 characters long, which makes it difficult to read and violates common Python style guides (like PEP 8). The previous multi-line version was more readable. It's recommended to break up long lines.

Suggested change
return self.client.call_adyen_api(request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs)
return self.client.call_adyen_api(
request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs
)

Get a fees cost estimate
"""
endpoint = self.baseUrl + "/getCostEstimate"
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/getCostEstimate"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The use of an f-string on a static string f"/getCostEstimate" is unnecessary as it provides no formatting. For improved readability and to make the string formatting intention clear, it's better to format the entire URL endpoint using an f-string.

Suggested change
endpoint = self.baseUrl + f"/getCostEstimate"
endpoint = f"{self.baseUrl}/getCostEstimate"

return self.client.call_adyen_api(
request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs
)
return self.client.call_adyen_api(request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This line is over 120 characters long, which makes it difficult to read and violates common Python style guides (like PEP 8). The previous multi-line version was more readable. It's recommended to break up long lines.

Suggested change
return self.client.call_adyen_api(request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs)
return self.client.call_adyen_api(
request, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs
)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant