I reproduced your source code with no other substantial changes, and with the parameter settings of UNet34 for the 2D network and Mink18A for the 3D network and voxel size=5cm, the 3D mIOU basically achieves the performance of 70.6 reported in your paper. However, the 2D mIOU is only 47.3, while your paper's result is 65.1, is this something I'm missing?

I reproduced your source code with no other substantial changes, and with the parameter settings of UNet34 for the 2D network and Mink18A for the 3D network and voxel size=5cm, the 3D mIOU basically achieves the performance of 70.6 reported in your paper. However, the 2D mIOU is only 47.3, while your paper's result is 65.1, is this something I'm missing?
