Skip to content

Support for MTCAP #14

@Eelviny

Description

@Eelviny

Following on from my thread here, I'm starting to get somewhere on pinpointing the issue.

TL;DR: Using this packet forwarder on a Multitech Conduit AP is suboptimal and results in severe packet loss, likely due to incorrect values for the antenna.

I have since switched to the inbuilt LoRa packet fowarder, and it's working perfectly. Because of the upcoming v3 stack, I intend to stay on the inbuilt forwarder, since this packet forwarder won't be needed... Therefore someone else would need to test this, but here's my theory:

From what I hear from MT support (I don't have much radio knowledge), the tx_lut values are very device-specific. While the MTCAP and MTCDT are very similar internally, they both have very different antenna designs.

When I switched to the default packet forwarder, I also erased the global_conf file with multitech_overrides, and replaced it with the default gateway-conf file from TTN (no modifications). Could it be that by adding a new multitech_overrides with values tailored for the MTCAP, that this issue could be fixed?

I can provide the stock conf files for both MTCDT and MTCAP if needed.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions