get_bis doesn't work

[JulianVeit]

Hey!

I am trying to run the code as was presented in the example usage. Somehow I have problems with the get_bis function and following warning message occurs:

library(BIS)
datasets <- get_datasets()
head(datasets, 20)
rates <- get_bis(datasets$url[datasets$name == "Policy rates (monthly)"], quiet = TRUE)
Rows: 39 Columns: 933
── Column specification ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
chr (933): X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, X9, X10, X11, X12, X13, X14, X15, X16, X...

ℹ Use spec() to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set show_col_types = FALSE to quiet this message.
Rows: 38 Columns: 933
── Column specification ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
chr (10): FREQ, Frequency, REF_AREA, Reference area, COMPILATION, Decimals, SOURCE...
dbl (921): DECIMALS, 1946-01, 1946-02, 1946-03, 1946-04, 1946-05, 1946-06, 1946-07,...
lgl (2): TIME_FORMAT, Time Format

ℹ Use spec() to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set show_col_types = FALSE to quiet this message.
Warning messages:
1: as_data_frame() was deprecated in tibble 2.0.0.
ℹ Please use as_tibble() instead.
ℹ The signature and semantics have changed, see ?as_tibble.
ℹ The deprecated feature was likely used in the BIS package.
Please report the issue at https://github.com/expersso/BIS/issues.
This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
Call lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings() to see where this warning was generated.
2: The x argument of as_tibble.matrix() must have unique column names if
.name_repair is omitted as of tibble 2.0.0.
ℹ Using compatibility .name_repair.
ℹ The deprecated feature was likely used in the tibble package.
Please report the issue at https://github.com/tidyverse/tibble/issues.
This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
Call lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings() to see where this warning was generated.

Any help is very much appreciated!

Best reagrds,
Veit