diff --git a/ai/security_report_2026-02-20_blog.md b/ai/security_report_2026-02-20_blog.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e0d0a6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ai/security_report_2026-02-20_blog.md
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+====
+
+Auto Security Analysis of blog at 2026-02-20
+CRITICAL - Stored XSS via Blog Post Content
+The `post.html` template uses the `|safe` filter to render the `content` of a blog post. Since the application uses `markdown2` to convert Markdown to HTML without enabling any sanitization options, any HTML tags included in the Markdown content will be rendered as-is. An attacker with access to the `create_post` route (e.g., via compromised credentials or CSRF) can inject malicious `'
+}
+session.post('http://localhost:5000/create_post', data=payload)
+
+# Anyone visiting /post/XSS_Test will now trigger the script alert.
+```
+
+Fix
+Remove the `|safe` filter from the `post.html` template to allow Jinja2 to escape HTML by default, or use a library like `bleach` to sanitize the HTML output of `markdown2` before passing it to the template if rendering some HTML is intended.
+
+====
+
+====
+
+Auto Security Analysis of blog at 2026-02-20
+MEDIUM - Path Traversal in Post Retrieval
+The `/post/` route takes a `name` parameter and directly joins it with the `POSTS_DIR` path and a `.md` extension. Because the `name` parameter is not sanitized, an attacker can use `../` sequences to traverse out of the intended directory and read any file on the system that ends with a `.md` extension.
+
+PoC
+```python
+import requests
+
+# Attacker tries to read a sensitive file that might exist as .md elsewhere on the system
+# For example, if there's a file /etc/some_config.md (simulated here)
+response = requests.get('http://localhost:5000/post/../../../../etc/some_config')
+print(response.text)
+```
+
+Fix
+Use `werkzeug.utils.secure_filename` on the `name` parameter before joining it with the directory path, or verify that the resolved path is still within the intended directory.
+
+====
+
+====
+
+Auto Security Analysis of blog at 2026-02-20
+MEDIUM - Lack of CSRF Protection
+The application does not implement any Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection for its state-changing routes, such as `/create_post`, `/upload/`, and `/login`. This allows an attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into performing unintended actions by making them visit a malicious website that submits forms to the blog application.
+
+PoC
+```html
+
+
+
+
+
+
+```
+
+Fix
+Implement CSRF protection using a library like `Flask-WTF`, which adds a unique token to each form and verifies it upon submission.
+
+====
+
+====
+
+Auto Security Analysis of blog at 2026-02-20
+LOW - Insecure Default Credentials
+The application defaults to `admin` as both the username and password if the `ADMIN_USERNAME` and `ADMIN_PASSWORD` environment variables are not set. This makes the application highly vulnerable to unauthorized access if deployed with default configurations.
+
+PoC
+```python
+import requests
+
+response = requests.post('http://localhost:5000/login', data={'username': 'admin', 'password': 'admin'})
+if response.status_code == 200:
+ print("Successfully logged in with default credentials!")
+```
+
+Fix
+Remove default credentials and require them to be explicitly set via environment variables, or force a password change upon first login.
+
+====
+
+### Summary of Vulnerabilities
+
+| Severity | Exploit Name |
+|----------|--------------|
+| CRITICAL | Stored XSS via Blog Post Content |
+| MEDIUM | Path Traversal in Post Retrieval |
+| MEDIUM | Lack of CSRF Protection |
+| LOW | Insecure Default Credentials |