Skip to content

[Siteplan] e2e testing#2126

Open
mariusheine wants to merge 53 commits intomainfrom
siteplan-e2e-testing
Open

[Siteplan] e2e testing#2126
mariusheine wants to merge 53 commits intomainfrom
siteplan-e2e-testing

Conversation

@mariusheine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Test Results

131 tests   131 ✅  27s ⏱️
 31 suites    0 💤
 31 files      0 ❌

Results for commit b690c6f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@mariusheine mariusheine marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@TruongQuangSB
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/license-check

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@mariusheine mariusheine marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2026 09:12
- name: Eslint
run: cd web/textviewer && npm run lint

test-siteplan:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mariusheine i think, we should make own workflow for all testing, also swtbot and this

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB Yeah good idea. I will adjust the workflows

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB For simplicity I kept the swtbot test in the ci workflow. In my opinion and with all I tried it is not worth the benefit. Maybe we can try again later but for now let's keep it like that. At least I put the siteplan testing into a separate workflow

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comment above

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@TruongQuangSB
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/request-license-review

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2026

License summary

❌ Not yet vetted dependencies:

Dependency License Status Ticket
npm/npmjs/-/dotenv/17.4.0 restricted clearlydefined
npm/npmjs/-/ol-mapbox-style/13.4.0 restricted clearlydefined
npm/npmjs/-/ol/10.8.0 BSD-2-Clause AND (BSD-2-Clause AND LicenseRef-scancode-free-unknown) AND (ODbL-1.0 AND OGC-1.0) AND (BSD-2-Clause AND LicenseRef-scancode-softsurfer AND MIT AND ODbL-1.0 AND OGC-1.0) AND OGC-1.0 AND LicenseRef-scancode-softsurfer AND ODbL-1.0 restricted #27017
npm/npmjs/-/playwright-core/1.59.1 restricted clearlydefined
npm/npmjs/-/vue-eslint-parser/10.4.0 restricted clearlydefined
  • Committers can request a license review via by commenting /request-license-review.
  • After all reviews have concluded, Committers can re-run the license-vetting check by commenting /license-check

Workflow run (with attached summary files):
https://github.com/eclipse-set/set/actions/runs/23891977831

@TruongQuangSB
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/request-license-review

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2026

License summary

⚠️ Failed to process DEPENDENCIES.
⚠️ Failed to request review of not vetted licenses.

  • Committers can request a license review via by commenting /request-license-review.
  • After all reviews have concluded, Committers can re-run the license-vetting check by commenting /license-check

Workflow run (with attached summary files):
https://github.com/eclipse-set/set/actions/runs/23894026886

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants