From b97debd5d01a12afefbbd61ab1acdd9cbd85d593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max Jones <14077947+maxrjones@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:01:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update tiny-chunks.ipynb

---
 docs/worst-practices/tiny-chunks.ipynb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/worst-practices/tiny-chunks.ipynb b/docs/worst-practices/tiny-chunks.ipynb
index 9ab4540..deccf7e 100644
--- a/docs/worst-practices/tiny-chunks.ipynb
+++ b/docs/worst-practices/tiny-chunks.ipynb
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
     "\n",
     "## Details\n",
     "\n",
-    "There are three primary reasons why you should avoid using too small of chunk sizes in your datacubes:\n",
+    "There are four primary reasons why you should avoid using too small of chunk sizes in your datacubes:\n",
     "\n",
     "- Inefficient compression since most compression algorithms leverage correlations within a chunk.\n",
     "- Inefficient data loading when querying large subsets of the data cube due to numerous GET requests with high latency. The excessive GET requests also increases costs.\n",