Skip to content

Org-wide Security Mapping Initiative (Apps, CI/CD, Identity, Data, Runtime) #13

@chitcommit

Description

@chitcommit

Objective

Run a single, evidence-based security mapping program across the ecosystem (not limited to 1Password Connect) to establish risk visibility, ownership, and a prioritized remediation backlog.

Scope

  • Orgs/repos: chittyos, chittyapps, chittyfoundation, chittycorp, furnished-condos
  • Layers:
    • Identity and secrets (1Password Connect/service accounts, token flows, rotation paths)
    • CI/CD controls (branch protection, required checks, SCA, secret scanning, provenance)
    • Application and API authz/authn boundaries (MCP gateways, service-to-service trust)
    • Data stores and custody (Neon, D1, KV, R2, backups, encryption, retention)
    • Runtime/network exposure (Cloudflare routes, workers, containers, ingress, egress)
    • Observability and incident response readiness

Deliverables

  1. Security topology map (systems, trust boundaries, identity edges)
  2. Control matrix by repo/service (implemented vs missing)
  3. Risk register with severity, blast radius, owner, and due date
  4. Prioritized remediation plan (P0/P1/P2) with implementation tickets
  5. Verification checklist and recurring review cadence

Workstreams

  • WS1 Asset inventory and dependency graph
  • WS2 Identity/secrets mapping (human + machine credentials)
  • WS3 CI/CD and SDLC control mapping
  • WS4 Runtime and data-plane hardening map
  • WS5 Threat scenarios + abuse path validation
  • WS6 Remediation execution and closure evidence

Acceptance Criteria

  • 100% repo inventory with owner + criticality classification
  • Token/secret flows documented for all production services
  • CI security gates defined and enforced for all active repos
  • P0 findings have owner + due date + validation criteria
  • Leadership-ready summary with residual risk statement

Initial P0 Focus

  • Service-token strategy (non-interactive, least-privilege, rotation tested)
  • Secrets exposure prevention (history scan + CI secret gates)
  • Durable auth boundaries for MCP/service ingress
  • Baseline branch protection and required checks across orgs

Notes

This issue is the tracking epic. Follow-up implementation issues should link back here and include concrete evidence (logs/screenshots/report artifacts).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestsecuritySecurity planning and remediation

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions