Memory Usage (Fork of a Fork) #16
Replies: 4 comments
-
|
And building the RNode binary, for those wondering what space would be consumed were RNode and this project combined on the same board: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Out of curiosity, what would be the purpose of combining microReticulum and RNode on the same device? Are you just speculating how much space an RNode with microReticulum support would consume? If so then you'd get a better a measure using https://github.com/attermann/microReticulum_Firmware instead. It's not up-to-date with the latest RNode but it does (in case you're not familiar with it) enable microReticulum transport-mode in an RNode-compatible firmware. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What I want to accomplish is: hand the device that requires no pairing to
neighbors who are not techno-savvy and then ask them to walk a prescribed
path around the neighborhood. No cell phone required. I would have up to
4 walkers and a base station. The T-Beam Supreme would have 1) RNode, 2)
microreticum, and 3) a custom testing program which ascertains the users
position and then messages to the four other units at set intervals, e.g.
15 seconds - 1 minute. Units receiving messages would log them to a file.
All units would have the predetermined Reticulum addresses hard-coded.
After all participants come back to the base station, I would then
download (looks like I can use the SD card) each units data and push the
logs into a database and then map the results. I haven't flushed out the
parse of the data, but trust I will be able to determine if a packet came
directly or through one or more intermediaries.
I want to know how effective is Lora, coupled with Reticulum, in an urban
and downtown setting. I'm 5 blocks away from the capitol in Salem where
there is often a lot of public expression. It seems to me coordinators of
such might want to be able to communicate anonymously and with reliance
upon cell phone and potential Stingray monitoring. When I read that
Stingray was being used by ICE, I felt compelled to explore something that
could bypass Stingray.
What I have determined is that I have 7 MBs of memory if I do not use
partitions and since I will be the owner of the units and only hand them
out for field trials, I do not have to worry about users upgrading & etc.
since I'll be burning the images. As I looked into this and learned about
the flash memory management of the T-Beam, I harkened back to over a decade
ago when I built a Gentoo image for the first Beaglebone and my getting
involved with Das Boot.
As I am learning about the architecture, It seems to me if existing
Meshastic users could try out a Reticulum unit simply by doing an upgrade
and then using SD Cards to switch back and forth between their standard
Meshtastic and Reticulum, we might open a door to get people to Reticulum.
…On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 12:17 PM Chad Attermann ***@***.***> wrote:
Out of curiosity, what would be the purpose of combining microReticulum
and RNode on the same device? Are you just speculating how much space an
RNode with microReticulum support would consume? If so then you'd get a
better a measure using
https://github.com/attermann/microReticulum_Firmware instead. It's not
up-to-date with the latest RNode but it does (in case you're not familiar
with it) enable microReticulum transport-mode in an RNode-compatible
firmware.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#16 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABXP4OZE2T4RVXLS54S6434H7NGXAVCNFSM6AAAAACSDGFJNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTKNJWGM3DQMA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
--
John L. Poole
Salem, Oregon
707-812-1323
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Love everything about what you're trying to accomplish. What you refer to as "1) RNode, 2) microreticum" is exactly what Don't hesitate to reach out if I can help in any way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I forked (https://github.com/jlpoolen/microReticulumTBeam) a fork (https://github.com/torlando-tech/microReticulum) of this project and successfully built an image for the LillyGO T-Beam SUPREME. I have been warned the project is incomplete, but I wanted to know what the memory consumption is, so I went ahead and built the project. Here are screenshots that answer that question along with the text.
Here's the text for posterity:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions