Course structure and content development #6
Description
Missing content or changes required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - introduce users to the course
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - where/how does Python get used in PHS
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - incorrect instructions with out of date reference
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - the foundation section is missing a lot of details, e.g. data types, comments, execution, and operators.
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - incorrect description and missing content
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - missing content on Python methods
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - description of 0-based indexing
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - description of variable assignment
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - bug in way exercise is created (file access)
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - style guide issue with non-specific/incrementing variable names
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - change for preferred function
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - empty quiz
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - empty exercise
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - bug in way exercise is created (hints and flow)
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - bug in way exercise is created (file access)
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - bug in way exercise is created (description and flow)
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - bug in way exercise is created (package management)
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - more details required
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - use of deprecated function
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - what next? Support continuing development and advertise further packages or ways to use Python
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - how can users get help/support in the organisation?
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - feedback link is incorrect
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - out of date screenshot of Posit Workbench interface
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - section title too long
It may also be worth considering:
- referencing when and how things differ from R (as the common language used, helping users understand similarities and differences)
Structure or section move changes
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - details of Python execution flow currently on homepage, move to 'Foundations'?
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - details of Python libraries introduced in 'IDE' section, move to 'Functions & Packages'?
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - control flow section introduced after functions, move to before?
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - subset of function introduced as new section
- Review of whole repo #4 (comment) - content is about data access, section on wrangling is missing?