DozerDB 5.26.3.0 Cannot DROP DATABASE with Python SDK

[Johnno1011]

Hi! Have been testing with the new Dozer DB release. Seems really good, and fixes previous issues such as this one. I have noticed that I am unable to drop databases using DROP DATABASE $dbname via the neo4j python SDK. I think this is likely related to the use of parameters again, as I am able to drop databases through the browser client by explicitly writing the database name directly in the command.

Please let me know if I can help with testing any related fixes on my side prior to a next stable release. Many thanks.

[jmsuhy]

I believe this is by design but I may be wrong. Have you ever been able to use a parameterized query to use the DROP database command with Neo4j EE 5.x before?

[Johnno1011]

Yes, with vanilla neo4j this has always been possible. Thanks

…

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025, 8:26 PM John Mark ***@***.***> wrote: I believe this is by design but I may be wrong. Have you ever been able to use a parameterized query to use the DROP database command with Neo4j EE 5.x before? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#34 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4OFP4L72YHRDX2TBGBONKT2RYPOLAVCNFSM6AAAAABX44RK4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOBWGEYTKMBYGI> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***> [image: jmsuhy]*jmsuhy* left a comment (DozerDB/dozerdb-core#34) <#34 (comment)> I believe this is by design but I may be wrong. Have you ever been able to use a parameterized query to use the DROP database command with Neo4j EE 5.x before? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#34 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4OFP4L72YHRDX2TBGBONKT2RYPOLAVCNFSM6AAAAABX44RK4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOBWGEYTKMBYGI> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

--

[jmsuhy]

Ok - we will put this on our list. And just to confirm - by vanilla Neo4j - are you talking about Neo4j 5.x enterprise? I figured you are - but just wanted to verify. Thank you.

[Johnno1011]

Hey Mark, thanks for the update and quick responses! To be clear, yes I am referring to neo4j 5x enterprise edition. In the meantime, I think I can get away with formatting the cypher with the database name. I will let you know if I have any issues with this temporary solution. Again, if you need any testing support on the SDK side of things then I'd be happy to assist here. Thanks, John.

…

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025, 10:36 PM John Mark ***@***.***> wrote: Ok - we will put this on our list. And just to confirm - by vanilla Neo4j - are you talking about Neo4j 5.x enterprise? I figured you are - but just wanted to verify. Thank you. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#34 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4OFP4MTM5BY7WKKXWCJ4QD2RY6VZAVCNFSM6AAAAABX44RK4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOBWGM3DGOJQGU> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***> [image: jmsuhy]*jmsuhy* left a comment (DozerDB/dozerdb-core#34) <#34 (comment)> Ok - we will put this on our list. And just to confirm - by vanilla Neo4j - are you talking about Neo4j 5.x enterprise? I figured you are - but just wanted to verify. Thank you. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#34 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4OFP4MTM5BY7WKKXWCJ4QD2RY6VZAVCNFSM6AAAAABX44RK4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOBWGM3DGOJQGU> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

--